20.01.2013 Views

The Art of the Helicopter John Watkinson - Karatunov.net

The Art of the Helicopter John Watkinson - Karatunov.net

The Art of the Helicopter John Watkinson - Karatunov.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Rotors in practice 121<br />

Designers <strong>of</strong>ten try to trim <strong>the</strong> machine so that in cruise <strong>the</strong> action <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tail plane<br />

opposes couples due to drag on <strong>the</strong> hull in order to align <strong>the</strong> shaft axis with <strong>the</strong> tip<br />

path axis because this minimizes <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> flapping and hence <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> wear<br />

and vibration. However, this will <strong>of</strong>ten be compromised because <strong>of</strong> variations in <strong>the</strong><br />

longitudinal position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CM. In tandem helicopters it is easier to align <strong>the</strong> tip path<br />

axis with <strong>the</strong> shaft axis. During a roll manoeuvre <strong>the</strong> tip path axis and <strong>the</strong> shaft axis<br />

must diverge in order to roll <strong>the</strong> hull.<br />

An observer turning with <strong>the</strong> tip path axis would see <strong>the</strong> fea<strong>the</strong>ring action changing<br />

<strong>the</strong> pitch <strong>of</strong> a given blade sinusoidally about <strong>the</strong> collective pitch setting at one cycle<br />

per revolution but as he is turning in <strong>the</strong> tip path plane he would not see any flapping<br />

(except for harmonics). In <strong>the</strong> steady hover no dragging would be observed, but in<br />

forward flight dragging would be seen due to <strong>the</strong> increased drag on <strong>the</strong> advancing<br />

blade compared with that on <strong>the</strong> retreating blade.<br />

4.3.3 <strong>The</strong> control axis<br />

<strong>The</strong>re exists a third axis, not parallel to <strong>the</strong> disc axis in translational flight, about which<br />

no blade fea<strong>the</strong>ring takes place. This is called <strong>the</strong> control axis, and it is <strong>the</strong> hardest one<br />

to visualize. An observer turning with <strong>the</strong> control axis in forward flight would note that<br />

<strong>the</strong> pitch <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blades was constant, but that <strong>the</strong> blades flapped up at <strong>the</strong> advancing<br />

side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> machine and down at <strong>the</strong> retreating side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tail. A given blade<br />

would appear to drag back when advancing, and <strong>the</strong>n forward when retreating. <strong>The</strong><br />

dragging would appear much greater than in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> observer on <strong>the</strong> disc axis.<br />

As Figure 4.3(b) shows, in <strong>the</strong> special case <strong>of</strong> a two-bladed rotor, if <strong>the</strong> pitch control<br />

rods stay parallel to <strong>the</strong> mast and are at 90◦ to <strong>the</strong> blades, <strong>the</strong> swashplate also rotates<br />

on <strong>the</strong> control axis. <strong>The</strong> blade stays parallel to <strong>the</strong> swashplate and so cannot fea<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with respect to it. In <strong>the</strong> general case <strong>the</strong> control axis and <strong>the</strong> swashplate axes are not<br />

<strong>the</strong> same as will be seen in section 4.13.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is an exact equivalence between <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> flapping seen by an observer on<br />

<strong>the</strong> control axis and <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> fea<strong>the</strong>ring seen by an observer on <strong>the</strong> tip path axis.<br />

Figure 4.3(c) shows that when <strong>the</strong> control and tip path axes differ by θ ◦ , if <strong>the</strong> blades<br />

reach a peak fea<strong>the</strong>ring angle <strong>of</strong> θ ◦ with respect to <strong>the</strong> tip path axis, <strong>the</strong>y will flap to a<br />

peak deflection <strong>of</strong> θ ◦ with respect to <strong>the</strong> control axis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> reason for <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> tip path axis and <strong>the</strong> control axis should<br />

now be clear. In <strong>the</strong> hover, <strong>the</strong>re would be no permanent difference as <strong>the</strong> blades<br />

follow <strong>the</strong> cyclic stick. However, in translational flight, <strong>the</strong> blades encounter highly<br />

asymmetrical conditions that pull <strong>the</strong> tip path axis away from <strong>the</strong> control axis. In order<br />

to fly straight and level, <strong>the</strong> pilot has to find a position for <strong>the</strong> cyclic stick in which <strong>the</strong><br />

asymmetrical conditions on <strong>the</strong> blades are precisely opposed by cyclic input so that <strong>the</strong><br />

rotor disc attitude is no longer affected by <strong>the</strong> asymmetry. For example, if at a certain<br />

airspeed <strong>the</strong> advancing/retreating effect would result in three degrees <strong>of</strong> flapback, <strong>the</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> three degrees <strong>of</strong> forward cyclic will put <strong>the</strong> rotor disc back in <strong>the</strong> attitude<br />

it would have had in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> flapback.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> shaft axis and <strong>the</strong> tip path axes can be non-parallel, clearly some joints or<br />

bearings are necessary or something must be designed to flex. <strong>The</strong> flapping and lagging<br />

bearings in an articulated head approximate to a constant velocity joint between <strong>the</strong><br />

shaft axis and <strong>the</strong> tip path axis. <strong>The</strong> spherical bearing in <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> swashplate<br />

and <strong>the</strong> fea<strong>the</strong>ring bearings in <strong>the</strong> rotor head allow <strong>the</strong> control axis to be different from<br />

<strong>the</strong> shaft axis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> motion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blades can be studied with respect to any one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above axes.<br />

Each has its own merits. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> control axis is instructive when studying <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!