20.01.2013 Views

The Art of the Helicopter John Watkinson - Karatunov.net

The Art of the Helicopter John Watkinson - Karatunov.net

The Art of the Helicopter John Watkinson - Karatunov.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

348 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Art</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Helicopter</strong><br />

were unsuitable. Once <strong>the</strong> true helicopter was developed, <strong>the</strong> gyroplane could not compete<br />

and its market contracted dramatically. <strong>The</strong> basic problem is that <strong>the</strong> rotating<br />

wings introduce some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> high stress, <strong>the</strong> mechanical complexity and <strong>the</strong> high maintenance<br />

regime <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> helicopter, for which <strong>the</strong>re is no compensating ability to hover.<br />

In gyroplanes having pusher propellers, <strong>the</strong> visibility from <strong>the</strong> cockpit is truly excellent.<br />

It has had some success as a recreational machine and in applications such as aerial<br />

photography where slow stable flight is an advantage, but has effectively been eclipsed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> helicopter.<br />

<strong>The</strong> gyroplane rotor experiences <strong>the</strong> same advancing/retreating and gyroscopic phenomena<br />

as <strong>the</strong> helicopter, in fact most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se were first discovered in <strong>the</strong> gyroplane.<br />

One does, however, tire <strong>of</strong> reading quite erroneous descriptions <strong>of</strong> how Juan de la<br />

Cierva’s machines rolled over because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lift difference between advancing and<br />

retreating blades. It is well established that <strong>the</strong> lift difference between advancing and<br />

retreating blades may result in a roll couple, but this is subject to <strong>the</strong> gyroscopic phase<br />

lag<strong>of</strong>90 ◦ that results in flapback. Clearly <strong>the</strong> advancing/retreating asymmetry was not<br />

<strong>the</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> de la Cierva’s difficulty.<br />

Figure 9.1 shows that de la Cierva’s early machines were basically aeroplanes having<br />

conventional aircraft controls but with a rotor added. <strong>The</strong> early rotors were hingeless<br />

and acted like gyroscopes. <strong>The</strong> problem was simply that when <strong>the</strong> conventional elevator<br />

was operated, a pitching moment was applied, but <strong>the</strong> rotor would precess this into a<br />

roll. Equally <strong>the</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ailerons would result in a rolling moment that would<br />

precess into a pitching motion. This was not a novel phenomenon; some World War<br />

I aircraft having rotary engines were notoriously gyroscopic and displayed precession<br />

whereby use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elevator would cause an amount <strong>of</strong> yaw.<br />

Fig. 9.1 An early de la Cierva autogyro having wings and aircraft-type control surfaces.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!