20.01.2013 Views

The Art of the Helicopter John Watkinson - Karatunov.net

The Art of the Helicopter John Watkinson - Karatunov.net

The Art of the Helicopter John Watkinson - Karatunov.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

144 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Art</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Helicopter</strong><br />

Fig. 4.24 When a blade drags, <strong>the</strong> CM moves closer to <strong>the</strong> rotor axis. In rotating co-ordinates, centrifugal<br />

force creates a restoring moment proportional to deflection such that <strong>the</strong> blade has a resonant response to<br />

excitation in dragging. Unlike flapping, <strong>the</strong> aerodynamic damping is low.<br />

to reduce stress. In o<strong>the</strong>r designs, <strong>the</strong> rotor is designed to be extremely stiff, but as<br />

stiffness is always finite, <strong>the</strong>re will still be some dragging motion. In all cases <strong>the</strong><br />

dynamics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system must be considered in order to avoid resonances.<br />

In a traditional articulated rotor head, <strong>the</strong> dragging hinge cannot apply a restoring<br />

moment to <strong>the</strong> blade. <strong>The</strong> only restoring force for dragging motion in this case is due to<br />

rotation. Figure 4.24 shows that when a blade drags on a hinge having an <strong>of</strong>fset from<br />

<strong>the</strong> rotor axis, <strong>the</strong> CM <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blade moves closer to that axis. When <strong>the</strong> rotor is turning,<br />

<strong>the</strong> CM will tend to be at <strong>the</strong> greatest possible radius and so if <strong>the</strong> blade drags forward<br />

or back, <strong>the</strong>re will be a restoring force. Figure 4.24 is drawn in a rotating frame <strong>of</strong><br />

reference in order to arrest <strong>the</strong> rotation. <strong>The</strong> acceleration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blade is now zero and<br />

has been replaced by an equivalent centrifugal force. It will be seen that <strong>the</strong> centrifugal<br />

force, which must pass through <strong>the</strong> rotor axis, creates a small moment due to <strong>the</strong> drag<br />

hinge <strong>of</strong>fset.<br />

<strong>The</strong> restoring moment is proportional to <strong>the</strong> deflection and <strong>the</strong> result is that a blade<br />

which suffers an in-plane disturbance will tend to execute simple harmonic motion at its<br />

resonant frequency. In an articulated rotor, resonant frequency is proportional to <strong>the</strong><br />

square root <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stiffness. <strong>The</strong> stiffness is due to centrifugal force and is proportional<br />

to <strong>the</strong> square <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> RRPM. Thus <strong>the</strong> dragging resonant frequency will be proportional<br />

to RRPM as was <strong>the</strong> case for articulated flapping. However, unlike flapping, <strong>the</strong> only<br />

aerodynamic damping available to <strong>the</strong> dragging motion is due to changes <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

drag. Damping will <strong>of</strong>ten need to be augmented by mechanical means.<br />

In hingeless rotors <strong>the</strong>re will be some degree <strong>of</strong> structural stiffness that will provide a<br />

restoring force for <strong>the</strong> blade even when <strong>the</strong> rotor is not turning. <strong>The</strong> dragging resonant<br />

behaviour <strong>of</strong> a rotor can be characterized by <strong>the</strong> Southwell coefficients. Figure 4.25<br />

shows how <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> dragging resonant frequency to rotor frequency is determined<br />

by K1and K2. K1reflects <strong>the</strong> resonant frequency when <strong>the</strong> rotor is not turning, as<br />

determined by <strong>the</strong> blade inertia and <strong>the</strong> stiffness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rotor/head system in <strong>the</strong> dragging<br />

plane and is called <strong>the</strong> structural stiffening component. For an articulated head, K1<br />

is zero because <strong>the</strong> dragging hinge has no stiffness. K2 is determined by <strong>the</strong> effective<br />

or actual dragging hinge <strong>of</strong>fset and represents what is usually called <strong>the</strong> centrifugal<br />

stiffening component.<br />

Figure 4.25(a) shows that in <strong>the</strong> articulated rotor, <strong>the</strong> hinge <strong>of</strong>fset and consequent<br />

restoring forces are generally small and so <strong>the</strong> dragging resonant frequency is a small<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rotor frequency, typically between 20 and 30%.<br />

In a hingeless rotor, shown in Figure 4.25(b), at low RRPM <strong>the</strong> structural stiffness<br />

will dominate, whereas at high RRPM rotational forces dominate and <strong>the</strong> dragging

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!