The Art of the Helicopter John Watkinson - Karatunov.net
The Art of the Helicopter John Watkinson - Karatunov.net
The Art of the Helicopter John Watkinson - Karatunov.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8.10 Stability<br />
<strong>Helicopter</strong> performance 341<br />
An unconditionally stable aircraft is one that, if disturbed from trimmed flight, can be<br />
placed in any attitude and <strong>the</strong>n, if <strong>the</strong> controls are released, it will return to straight and<br />
level flight on its own. <strong>The</strong> ability to return to straight and level flight is known as static<br />
stability, whereas dynamic stability is concerned with <strong>the</strong> manner, or promptness, with<br />
which <strong>the</strong> return occurs. Free flying model aeroplanes and some full-size aeroplanes are<br />
unconditionally stable. In forward flight on <strong>the</strong> upward part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> power curve, many<br />
helicopters are stable because <strong>the</strong> tail rotor acts like a fin and <strong>the</strong> tail surfaces have<br />
sufficient pitch authority. However, as <strong>the</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> helicopter is to hover, a great deal<br />
<strong>of</strong> flying will take place on <strong>the</strong> back <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> power curve where stability is impossible to<br />
achieve without pilot intervention or some artificial mechanism. Thus to be fair, it is not<br />
that helicopters are fundamentally less stable than aeroplanes, more that helicopters<br />
can explore flight regimes that are not available to aeroplanes in which control is simply<br />
harder.<br />
Stability is a topic where <strong>the</strong>re may be conflict between performance and safety and<br />
between complexity and economy. It is important to consider <strong>the</strong> entire system in<br />
order to form a balanced view. <strong>The</strong> airframe itself will have certain stability behaviour,<br />
but this will be modified by <strong>the</strong> actions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pilot. Technically a helicopter airframe<br />
may be unstable, but piloting <strong>the</strong>se unstable devices gives many <strong>of</strong> us a great deal <strong>of</strong><br />
pleasure. This is because <strong>the</strong> actions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pilot turn <strong>the</strong> unstable airframe into a stable<br />
system. In fact <strong>the</strong> unstable airframe with an intelligent pilot and/or control system<br />
forms <strong>the</strong> most manoeuvrable combination because it is axiomatic that <strong>the</strong> more stable<br />
<strong>the</strong> airframe is made, <strong>the</strong> less willing it is to deviate from its course.<br />
Pilots very quickly become instinctive and fly at constant altitude with correct RRPM<br />
and no slip without conscious thought. It doesn’t make much difference to <strong>the</strong> pilot if<br />
<strong>the</strong> machine deviates from his intended course because <strong>of</strong> a gust or because it is has<br />
a degree <strong>of</strong> instability. <strong>The</strong> result is <strong>the</strong> same; he operates <strong>the</strong> controls to bring it back on<br />
course. In good conditions, <strong>the</strong> pilot has so little difficulty in doing this that he can fly<br />
a machine with significant stability problems without necessarily realizing. However, if<br />
visibility becomes poor so that <strong>the</strong> horizon is obscured, <strong>the</strong> pilot’s instinctive ability to<br />
stabilize <strong>the</strong> machine is impaired. Now <strong>the</strong> machine that is fun to fly VFR because it is so<br />
manoeuvrable becomes a menace in IFR because <strong>the</strong> workload involved in interpreting<br />
<strong>the</strong> artificial horizon and o<strong>the</strong>r instruments to make constant course corrections may<br />
be too great.<br />
Today most helicopters are designed on <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong>y will be used in<br />
IFR, but this has not always been <strong>the</strong> case. In practice machines certified for VFR only<br />
may have subsequently undergone a number <strong>of</strong> modifications in order to obtain IFR<br />
certification. <strong>The</strong>se modifications frequently involve stability and pilot workload. In<br />
some cases modifications to stability can mean that a machine formerly requiring two<br />
pilots for IFR can <strong>the</strong>n be certified for single pilot IFR flight.<br />
<strong>The</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> airframe can also be augmented artificially. Several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />
techniques were shown in Chapter 7. In principle an unstable airframe with an<br />
artificial stability system gives <strong>the</strong> best <strong>of</strong> both worlds because <strong>the</strong> pilot can retain<br />
<strong>the</strong> manoeuvrability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unstable airframe whilst enjoying <strong>the</strong> artificial stability. In<br />
practice some thought has to be given to what will happen if <strong>the</strong> artificial stability<br />
system fails in IFR. Ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> artificial system has to be made redundant so that<br />
it continues to function in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a failure or <strong>the</strong> airframe has to be made<br />
sufficiently stable that pilot workload remains reasonable if <strong>the</strong> augmentation system<br />
fails. Aerodynamic stability improvements are very reliable because <strong>the</strong>y usually