24.01.2013 Views

Insomnia Insomnia

Insomnia Insomnia

Insomnia Insomnia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

162 Perlis et al.<br />

effect), (3) may reinforce the tendency for EMAs, and (4) undermines the opportunity<br />

to pair “sleep” with the bed/bedroom.<br />

Second, it should be noted that SRT has some paradoxical aspects. One paradox<br />

is that patients who report being unable to sleep are in essence being told to sleep<br />

less. The other paradox occurs over the course of treatment. With therapy, patients<br />

find that it is difficult to stay awake until the prescribed hour. This, if not paradoxical,<br />

is at least ironic for the patient who initially presents with sleep-onset difficulties.<br />

Finally, it should be noted that SRT may be contraindicated in patients with<br />

histories of mania or seizure disorder because it may aggravate these conditions.<br />

Adjunctive Interventions<br />

Sleep Hygiene Education<br />

Sleep hygiene education is recommended, along with SRT and SCT, for both sleep<br />

initiation and maintenance problems. It may also have some value as a means toward<br />

increasing TST. Sleep hygiene education addresses a variety of behaviors that may<br />

influence sleep quality and quantity. The intervention most often involves providing<br />

the patient with a handout and then reviewing the items and the rationales for them.<br />

Table 1 contains a set of sleep hygiene instructions. It should be noted that in this<br />

formulation, several aspects of other therapies are adopted. For example, items 1, 2,<br />

12, 13, and 15 are traditionally considered part of SCT and/or SRT.<br />

Sleep hygiene education is most helpful when tailored to a behavioral analysis<br />

of the patient’s sleep–wake behaviors. The tailoring process allows the clinician<br />

the opportunity to (1) demonstrate the extent to which he or she comprehends the<br />

patient’s individual circumstances (by knowing which items do and do not apply),<br />

(2) suggest modifications, and (3) show the patient the rules, which are in many<br />

ways too “absolutistic.” Consider the following two examples:<br />

• The admonishment to avoid caffeinated products may be, in general, too simply construed.<br />

Caffeinated beverages may be used to combat daytime fatigue (especially during<br />

acute therapy) and, if the withdrawal is timed correctly, may actually enhance the<br />

subject’s ability to fall asleep.<br />

• The prohibition against napping may not be practical. Elderly subjects or subjects with<br />

extreme work performance demands may indeed need to compensate for sleep loss. A<br />

more considerate approach to napping may entail taking into account the time of the<br />

nap, the duration of the nap, and how nocturnal sleep is handled on days when subjects<br />

nap. Napping earlier in the day will allow for more homeostatic pressure for nocturnal<br />

sleep. Limiting the duration of the nap will allow for less of a discharge of the<br />

homeostat and enhance the subjects sensation of feeling rested from the nap (by avoiding<br />

awakening from slow wave sleep). Going to bed later, when one naps during the<br />

day, may minimize the effects of the nap on nocturnal sleep.<br />

Finally, it can be argued that the most important aspect of sleep hygiene education<br />

derives not so much from the “tips” provided, but from allowing the clinician<br />

the opportunity to demonstrate his or her knowledge. A thoughtful and elaborate<br />

review may enhance the patient’s confidence in the therapist and in the treatment<br />

regimen. Such enhanced confidence may lead to greater adherence or compliance<br />

with the more difficult aspects of therapy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!