25.01.2013 Views

The Cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament; - The Search For ...

The Cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament; - The Search For ...

The Cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament; - The Search For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96 THE CUNEIFORM INSCRIPTIONS AND TEE 0. T.<br />

22. ul^V often occurs in <strong>the</strong> <strong>inscriptions</strong> in <strong>the</strong> feminine<br />

form riaratu*; see for example Tigl.-Pil. II (II Rawl. 67)<br />

line 14 (mat I'lamti); <strong>the</strong> 'Elamite' is called I'lamU<br />

(Sanherib Taylor-cyl. IV. 46, 70; V. 25). <strong>The</strong> definite<br />

geographical meaning belonging to <strong>the</strong> territorial name may<br />

be learnt from <strong>the</strong> Behistun inscription of Darius, in which<br />

a Persian term U v a j a i. e. Susiana corresponds to <strong>the</strong><br />

Babylonian I'- lam -mat (Beh. 41. comp. NR. 11); see also<br />

<strong>the</strong> remarks on Ezra IV. 9. <strong>The</strong> name Elam is assigned by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Semitic Babylonians to <strong>the</strong> Susian highl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> itself<br />

signifies "highl<strong>and</strong>", root ^bv. This is confirmed by <strong>the</strong> Akka-<br />

dian expression for <strong>the</strong> same region, Numraa-Ki, meaning<br />

also "highl<strong>and</strong>" (A. H. Sayce) ; see <strong>the</strong> syllab. II Rawl. 2,<br />

451 foil., V Rawl. 16, IB foil. a. b. <strong>The</strong> native name was<br />

according to <strong>the</strong> Susian brick-<strong>inscriptions</strong> derived from <strong>the</strong><br />

112 capital Susan {= Susin or Susun of <strong>the</strong> Susian brick-<br />

<strong>inscriptions</strong>) <strong>and</strong> was pronounced Susinak i. e. Susiana;<br />

see on Ezra IV. 9. Compare also Oppert, les <strong>inscriptions</strong><br />

en lang. sus. (extrait des m(5moires du congr. internat. 1873)<br />

pp.<br />

1 79 foil. ; A.H. Sayce in Transactions of <strong>the</strong>Soc. of Bibl.<br />

Archaeol. Ill pp. 468, 478; Th. Noldeke in N. G.G.V^^**<br />

Apr. 1 pp. 173. Elam is by no means interchangeable<br />

with or equivalent to Persia. We never meet with <strong>the</strong><br />

name "Persia" or "Persian" before <strong>the</strong> time of Cyrus, ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

on an Assyrian or a Babylonian monument.***<br />

* <strong>The</strong> latter st<strong>and</strong>s as I'- lam-mat also in Beh. 41 (see Text).<br />

Correction is to be made according to this in my Assyrisch-Babylouische<br />

Keiliuschriften p. 346. (<strong>The</strong>re also we must supply "Aegypt" instead<br />

of "Armenia" in accordance with <strong>the</strong> Persian text.)<br />

** = "Nachrichten von der Gottinger Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften."<br />

*** To this we would add:— "<strong>and</strong> also not in any pre-exilic Biblical<br />

extract." We are at once led back to <strong>the</strong> conclusion that a fragment,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!