25.01.2013 Views

The Cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament; - The Search For ...

The Cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament; - The Search For ...

The Cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament; - The Search For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

306 THE CUNEIFOBM INSCRIPTIONS AND TEE 0. T.<br />

no space in <strong>the</strong> Biblical record for this subsequent cam-<br />

paign. It is at Lakish (where Sanherib is supposed by<br />

Rawlinson to have held his court during his second expedi-<br />

tion against Aegypt) that we already find <strong>the</strong> Great King<br />

at <strong>the</strong> very time when he was receiving <strong>the</strong> tribute from<br />

Hezekiah (2 Kings XVIU. 14), that is, according to Raw-<br />

linson, during <strong>the</strong> first campaign. Yet it is hardly to be<br />

supposed that Sanherib on both occasions made exactly<br />

<strong>the</strong> same spot his head-quarters, <strong>and</strong> also that Hezekiah<br />

despatched envoys to him both times just at <strong>the</strong> moment<br />

when <strong>the</strong> Great King was staying at this place , no earlier<br />

<strong>and</strong> no later! Besides, Sanherib in his military records<br />

says not a syllable about this second campaign against Syria.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> second campaign actually occurred, this silence<br />

313 would be altoge<strong>the</strong>r incomprehensible, because something<br />

by way of glorification might undoubtedly have been re-<br />

ported by <strong>the</strong> Great King of an invasion that could extend<br />

close up to <strong>the</strong> Aegyptian frontier. And lastly, as we<br />

have already shown, those who can read between <strong>the</strong> lines<br />

can perceive from <strong>the</strong> narrative of <strong>the</strong> Great King with<br />

tolerable clearness, that <strong>the</strong> success of his enterprise against<br />

Aegypt was no very striking one.* Why should we <strong>the</strong>n<br />

II ed. London 1862 Vol. 1 p. 393, <strong>and</strong> G. Rawlinson, <strong>The</strong> Five Great<br />

monarchies 2'id cd. Vol. II p. 165 ; comp. above 306 foil. note. [J. Oppert<br />

in his Memoire sur les rapports de I'Egypte et de I'Assyrie dans<br />

I'antiquit^ p. 22 foil, maintains <strong>the</strong> view that is held by Dr. Schrader,<br />

that <strong>the</strong> events described in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Old</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> cuneiform in-<br />

scriptions refer to a single campaign, as opposed to Rawlinson's <strong>the</strong>ory<br />

of two campaigns.— Translator.]<br />

* In this connection I would draw attention to <strong>the</strong> fact that San-<br />

herib in his triumphal <strong>inscriptions</strong> refers to <strong>the</strong> payment of tribute<br />

by Hezekiah <strong>and</strong> to that king's position as a vassal (comp. for example<br />

<strong>the</strong> inscription of Constantinople I Rawl. 43 line 15 ; see above on<br />

1 Kings XIV. 21), but that he makes no mention of <strong>the</strong> victory over

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!