25.01.2013 Views

The Cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament; - The Search For ...

The Cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament; - The Search For ...

The Cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament; - The Search For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECOND BOOK OF KINGS XV. 215<br />

17. ^K"^^? /i^'DHJp 1,2'^ Menahem became king— of Israel.<br />

Also <strong>the</strong> cuneiform <strong>inscriptions</strong> mention an Israelite Mena-<br />

hem under <strong>the</strong> form Minihimmu of Samaria. <strong>The</strong> chief<br />

passage occurs in <strong>the</strong> annals of Tiglath-Pileser Layard 50,<br />

10: Ma-da-tu Ku-us-ta- as-pi Ku-um-mu-ha-ai,<br />

Ra-sun-nu Dimaskai*, Mi-ni- hi-im-mi Sa-ml-<br />

ri-na-ai &c. i. e. "tribute of Kustaspi of Kumuch, of<br />

Rezin of Damaskus , of Menahera of Samaria &c.", comp. 224<br />

III Rawl. 9. 50.<br />

What are we to say of this king, mentioned in Tiglath-<br />

Pileser's inscription? If we take <strong>the</strong> Biblical chronology<br />

into account, an identification of this person with <strong>the</strong> Mena-<br />

hem of <strong>the</strong> Bible is scarcely feasible. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> beginning<br />

of <strong>the</strong> twenty years' reign of Pekah (758), who was second in<br />

succession after Menahem, falls as much as 13 years before<br />

<strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> reign of Tiglath-Pileser in <strong>the</strong> year 745!<br />

In consideration of this circumstance, we were disposed to<br />

adopt <strong>the</strong> view that <strong>the</strong> Menahem of <strong>the</strong> <strong>inscriptions</strong> might<br />

have been a rival king to Pekah , who threw himself into<br />

<strong>the</strong> arms of <strong>the</strong> Assyrian despot in order to win recognition.<br />

But to say nothing of <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> Bible says not a word<br />

respecting such a second Menahem , this hypo<strong>the</strong>sis of a<br />

later Menahem is not easily compatible with <strong>the</strong> well nigh<br />

contemporary mention in <strong>the</strong> cuneiform records of a Judaean<br />

king Azarjah i.e. Uzziah (see above). This latter circum-<br />

stance ra<strong>the</strong>r leads us to identify <strong>the</strong> Menahem of <strong>the</strong> in-<br />

scriptions with <strong>the</strong> older. Biblical Menahem, exactly con-<br />

temporary with Uzziah-Azarjah. We thus arrive at <strong>the</strong><br />

following identification<br />

:<br />

* In <strong>the</strong> text st<strong>and</strong>s (mat) G ar-I miri-Su-ai. On this see above<br />

p. 138.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!