25.01.2013 Views

The Cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament; - The Search For ...

The Cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament; - The Search For ...

The Cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament; - The Search For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECOND BOOK OF KIXGS XV. 231<br />

of o<strong>the</strong>r rulers), or having a name like it, does not appear<br />

on <strong>the</strong> lists of Assyrian kings , if he be not identical with<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r Assyrian king, which o<strong>the</strong>r Assyrian king, again,<br />

on historical grounds can only be Tiglath-Pileser ; (9) Pul<br />

<strong>and</strong> P6r are shown to be one <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> same name by<br />

virtue of a phonetic law which has been established from<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r examples. Under <strong>the</strong>se circumstances* it appears in<br />

my estimation impossible to avoid <strong>the</strong> supposition that Pul<br />

<strong>and</strong> Por, <strong>and</strong> also Pul <strong>and</strong> Tiglath-Pileser, are one <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

same person. If this however be so, light is at once cast24o<br />

on <strong>the</strong> obscurity which involves <strong>the</strong> chronological problem,<br />

<strong>and</strong> especially <strong>the</strong> relation of <strong>the</strong> considerably longer<br />

Israelite measurement of time to <strong>the</strong> proportionally shorter<br />

Assyrian measurement— an obscurity which writers for some<br />

time past have only been able to dispel by violent hypo-<br />

<strong>the</strong>ses, see Keilinsch. u. Gesch. pp. 440 &c.<br />

19. A7id Menahem gave Pul 1000 talents of silver', see<br />

note on Gen. XXIII. 16 <strong>and</strong> 2 Kings XVIII. 14.<br />

20. Fifty shekels of<br />

silver to every man i. e. exactly one<br />

mina to each man, see note on Gen. XXIII. 16.<br />

29. in <strong>the</strong> days of Pekah king of Israel, <strong>the</strong>re advanced<br />

* We have no right to quote as ano<strong>the</strong>r argument for this identity,<br />

with H. Kawlinson, E. Lepsius <strong>and</strong> H. Br<strong>and</strong>es, 1 Chron. V. 26, in<br />

which <strong>the</strong> transportation of transjordanic Israelites is equally attributed<br />

to Pul <strong>and</strong> to Tiglath-Pileser. <strong>For</strong> this statement rests, in <strong>the</strong> first<br />

place, on a confusion of what is reported in 2 Kings XV. 29 of Tiglath-<br />

Pilesei", <strong>and</strong> what is said in 2 Kings XVII. 6 of Salmanassar ; <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />

second place, on a transference to Pul of what according to <strong>the</strong> Books<br />

of Kings is only true of Tiglath-Pileser. This passage can only be<br />

cited as a proof of <strong>the</strong> ease with which in Biblical writers generally<br />

confusions of events or persons might occur, <strong>and</strong> how very possible<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore might appear even <strong>the</strong> differentiation by <strong>the</strong>se writers of one<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> same personality into two distinct ones. See also Keilinsch.<br />

u. Gesch. pp. 431, 435 foil.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!