29.01.2013 Views

READING HEINRICH HEINE

READING HEINRICH HEINE

READING HEINRICH HEINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ventriloquism in Ludwig Börne: eine Denkschrift 163<br />

the literary circles of Paris, and by collaborating with French journals and<br />

publishers, including Eugène Renduel, who initiated a French edition of<br />

his work. 26 In the context of the Denkschrift,however, Heine senses he must<br />

face sharp competition from Börne on home ground, in the programme of<br />

their German publisher Campe.<br />

In the account of their Frankfurt meeting in 1827, the first after Heine<br />

had glimpsed Börne as a child, the talk rapidly turns to publishers:<br />

Our conversation began with Cotta and Campe, and when, after some customary<br />

complaints, I admitted the good qualities of the latter, Börne confided that he was<br />

pregnant with the publication of his complete writings, and would make a note of<br />

Campe for this project. (B 4, 13)<br />

This sounds like a recommendation. 27 The possibility that Heine did recommend<br />

his competitor is confirmed by Campe’s comment in a letter to<br />

Heine on 28 December 1831: ‘You introduced Börne. He has returned his<br />

verdict on you. Now are you happy?’ 28 But the possessive designation of<br />

Campe in the Denkschrift as ‘publisher of the “Reisebilder”’ (B 4, 14) suggests<br />

Heine’s own sensitivity on the matter. Certainly, as the years went by,<br />

Heine increasingly suspected that Börne’s Briefe aus Paris were receiving<br />

preferential treatment from Campe. 29<br />

This straightforward struggle for pride of place in Campe’s enterprise is<br />

the most direct ground for the growing conflict between the two writers.<br />

Heine elaborates their competing claims in a number of ways. In Book 3 he<br />

claims to desire popular influence as an orator (‘Volksredner’), like Börne,<br />

and not as a Petrarchan poet. This admission is offered as a surprise to the<br />

reader (‘an admission . . . that you weren’t expecting’ (B 4, 74)): after all,<br />

the purpose of the attacks mounted on Heine by Börne and his school had<br />

been to reduce him, precisely, to mere poetry:<br />

...they denied me any character at all, and only allowed any validity to the poet.<br />

Yes, I received my political discharge, so to speak, and was as it were transferred in<br />

retirement to Parnassus. (B 4, 129)<br />

When Heine claims to aspire to oratory, however, it is important to recognize<br />

that the example he cites – ‘like Demosthenes I sometimes declaimed<br />

on the solitary sea-shore when the wind and the waves roared and howled’<br />

(B 4, 74)–conceals an allusion to the ‘Nordsee’ cycles from the end of Buch<br />

der Lieder. Asweshall see, the fluency with which Heine cites other texts,<br />

his own as well as Börne’s, in the course of the Denkschrift is an important<br />

part of his strategy of indirection, of the oblique. 30 Nevertheless, he is also<br />

able to be perfectly direct in his assessment of the conflict. In Book 4,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!