29.01.2013 Views

READING HEINRICH HEINE

READING HEINRICH HEINE

READING HEINRICH HEINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ventriloquism in Ludwig Börne: eine Denkschrift 171<br />

The context of these remarks has been identified as the series of attacks<br />

mounted against Heine in the press by Ludwig Wihl (and Karl Gutzkow),<br />

as a result of the Schwabenspiegel (‘Mirror for Swabians’) affair. In 1838<br />

Heine’s intention to publish the emancipatory verse of the Verschiedene<br />

cycles (‘Sundry Women’) was frustrated by the criticism of the Swabian<br />

moralist poets, and by his former ally Gutzkow. 44 However, the Homeric<br />

model is equally significant in the Denkschrift. Heine had – he hoped –<br />

thrashed Börne by maintaining his public silence (and the participle<br />

‘schweigend’, translated here as ‘without a word’, could be read in an instrumental<br />

sense, to mean ‘you thrashed him by being silent’). More broadly<br />

he claimed for himself the same mastery of the word attributed to wily<br />

Odysseus.<br />

This is the first appearance of a recurrent image, which associates<br />

Odysseus’ patient endurance in suffering (‘Dulder’) with his fluent and<br />

cunning speech. In Lutetia, itisusually King Louis-Philippe who appears<br />

in this Homeric comparison: ‘Or is such a lust for war merely a warlike<br />

ruse of the divine sufferer Odysseus?’ (B 5, 307) Later, the king is said to<br />

be like Odysseus ‘the patient and inventive sufferer’ (B 5, 330) and finally,<br />

in a variant reading of Lutetia I, article XVIII in the Augsburger Allgemeine<br />

Zeitung,Odysseus is praised for having avoided fighting ‘if he could make<br />

do with the diplomacy of speech’ (B 5, 1005). Odysseus is celebrated for<br />

his ruses, for his inventiveness, and for the substitution of diplomatic talk<br />

for direct conflict. These qualities – imagination, cunning, and diplomatic<br />

language – all provide the strategic means by which Heine’s ‘mastery of the<br />

word’ could resist Börne’s moral immediacy as a judge of character.<br />

ventriloquism<br />

Between the account in Book 1 of Heine’s encounter with Börne in Frankfurt<br />

and the continuation of their conversations in Paris, culminating in<br />

Heine’s comic account of Börne’s enthusiasm for the ‘Hambach Festival’,<br />

Heine inserted as Book 2 a series of letters he claims to have written while<br />

in Heligoland, reflecting his mood before and after news reached him of<br />

the July Revolution in Paris. (In fact these ‘letters’ are of a later date, and are<br />

designed to celebrate July 1830 as a renewal of the revolution and Heine’s<br />

insight into its significance.) The Cuxhafen letter at the end of Book 2<br />

of the Denkschrift provides a clue to the cunning of Heine’s construction<br />

in the Börne book as a whole. The sea passage which will take Heine’s<br />

narrative from holidaying in Heligoland to revolutionary Paris is a rough<br />

crossing: ‘Even the sea, like other persons, rewards my love with trouble

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!