a semiarid region of Spain, Journal of the Agricultural Engineering Resources, 70: 285–294.Burgess, S.S.O., Adams, M.A., Turner, N.C., Ong, C.K. 1998. The redistribution of soil water bytree root systems. Oecologia, 115: 306-311.Burgess, S.S.O., Adams, M.A., Turner, N.C., Beverly, C.R., Ong, C.K., Khan, A.A.H.,Bleby,T.M. 2001. An improved heat pulse method to measure slow and reverse flow inwoody plants. Tree Physiology. 21:589-598.Braud, I., Dantas-Antonino, A.C., Vauclin, M., Thony, J.L.,Ruelle, P., 1995. A simple soil- plantatmospheretransfer model (SiSPAT) development and field verification. J. Hydrol. 166:213–250.Brisson N., Mary B., Ripoche D., Jeuffroy M.H., Ruget F., Nicoullaud B., Gate P., Devienne-Baret F., Antonioletti R., Durr C., Richard G., Beaudoin N., Recous S., Tayot X., PlenetD., Cellier P., Machet J.M., Meynard J.M., Delécolle R., 1998. STICS: a generic modelfor the simulation of crops and their water and nitrogen balances. I. Theory andparametrization applied to wheat and corn, Agronomy journal 18: 311-346.Brisson N., 1999. Documentation de STICS version 4.0, Copyright INRA.Carlson, T.N., et M.J., Buffum, 1989. On estimating total daily evapotranspiration from remotesurface temperature measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 29, 197-207.Caselles, V., & Delegido, J., 1987. A simple model to estimate the daily value of the regionalmaximum evapotranspiration from satellite temperature and albedo images, InternationalJournal of Remote Sensing, 8: 1151– 1152.Caselles, V., Artigao, M.M., Hurtado, E., Coll, C., Brasa, A., 1998. Mapping actualevapotranspiration by combining landsat TM and NOAA-AVHRR images: application tothe Barrax Area, Albacete, Spain. Remote Sensing of Environment 63, 1–10.Chanzy, A., 1991. Modelisation simplifiée de l’évaporation d’un sol nu utilisant l’humidité et latemperature de surface accessibles par télédétection. Thèse de docteur ingénieuragronome de l’Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, France, p221.Chaudhury, B.J., 1997. Estimating land surface evaporation using multispectral satellite andancillary data. In: Kite, G.W., Pietronir, A., Pultz, T. (Eds.), Applications of RemoteSensing in Hydrology. Proceedings of the Symposium No. 17 NHRI, Saskatoon, CanadaNational Hydrology Research Institute (NHRI).94
Chehbouni, A., D.C. Goodrich, M.S. Moran, C.J. Watts, Y.H. Kerr, G. Dedieu, W.G. Kepner,W.J. Shuttleworth et S. Sorooshian, 2000. A Preliminary Synthesis of Major ScientificResults during the Salsa Program, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 105, 311-323.Chehbouni A., Escadafal R., Dedieu G., Errouane S., Boulet G., Duchemin B., Mougenot B.,Sminonneaux V., Seghieri J., Timouk F., 2003. A multidisciplinary program for assessingthe sustainability of water resources in semi-arid basin in Morocco: SUDMED. EGS -AGU - EUG Joint Assembly, Nice, France, 6-11 April 2003.Chehbouni A., Escadafal R., Boulet G., Duchemin B., Dedieu G., Hannich L., et al. 2004.Integrated modelling and remote sensing approach for sustainable management of waterresources in Tensift region (SudMed) : preliminary results, current status and newchallenges. Integrated Water Resources Research and Development in southeasternMorocco, International Conference, 1st- 2nd April 2004, Ouarzazate, Morocco.Chehbouni, A., Escadafal, R., Boulet, G., Duchemin, B., Simonneaux, V., Dedieu, G.,Mougenot, B., Khabba, S., Kharrou, H., Merlin, O., Chaponnière, A., Ezzahar, J., Er-Raki, S., Hoedjes, J., Hadria, R., Abourida, H., Cheggour, A., Raibi, F., Hanich, L.,Guemouria, N., Chehbouni, Ah., Olioso, A., Jacob, F., Sobrino, J., 2007. The Use ofRemotely Sensed data for Integrated Hydrological Modeling in Arid and Semi-AridRegions: the SUDMED Program. Int. J. Remote Sens. accepted.Choudhury, B.J., Ahmed, N.U., Idso, S.B., Reginato, R.J., and Daughtry, C.S.T., 1994. RelationsBetween evaporation coefficients and vegetation indices studies by model simulations.Remote Sens. Environ., 50: 1-17.Chuanyana, Z., Zhongrena, N., Zhaodonga, F., 2004. GIS-assisted spatially distributed modelingof the potential evapotranspiration in semi-arid climate of the Chinese Loess Plateau.Journal of arid environment, 58: 387-403.Civantos, L., 1997. La olivicultura en el mundo y en Espan˜a. In: Barranco, D., Fernandez-Escobar, R., Rallo, L. (Eds.), El cultivo del olivo. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, pp. 15–31.Damagnez, J. 1968. les bilans hydriques et énergétiques et l’étude des facteurs du milieu.Agroclimatological method. Proc. Of the Redding Sym. UNESCO, Paris.Droogers, P., Allen, R.G., 2002. Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate dataconditions. Irrig. Drain. Syst., 16: 33–45.95
- Page 2 and 3:
A mes chers ParentsA mes frères et
- Page 4 and 5:
• Projet SUDMED: Collaboration en
- Page 6 and 7:
3. Er-Raki, S., Chehbouni, G., Guem
- Page 8 and 9:
ont donné l’accès de faire les
- Page 10 and 11:
évaporation du sol (30% de l’irr
- Page 12 and 13:
which it was estimated spatially by
- Page 14 and 15:
SommaireRESUME.....................
- Page 16 and 17:
Figure 3. 9. Coefficient du stress
- Page 18:
Comme grand nombre de pays à trave
- Page 21:
CHAPITRE 1 : BESOINS EN EAU DESCULT
- Page 24 and 25:
1.3 La culture de l’olivierImport
- Page 27 and 28:
Tenant compte de l’importance éc
- Page 29 and 30:
Où ET représente l’évapotransp
- Page 31 and 32:
LandSat 4 …, basse résolution NO
- Page 33 and 34:
principalement sur des relations en
- Page 35 and 36:
Dans ce chapitre, nous allons prés
- Page 37 and 38:
Figure 2. 1. Trois types d’évapo
- Page 39 and 40:
couvert foliaire, et (4) la phase d
- Page 41 and 42:
Avec :K c max : Valeur maximale de
- Page 43 and 44:
Si on utilise l’approche à coeff
- Page 46 and 47:
2.3.1 Présentation de la région d
- Page 48:
généralement de zone Bour. L’ab
- Page 54 and 55:
Table 2. 1. Les différents paramè
- Page 56 and 57:
En plus des mesures météorologiqu
- Page 58 and 59:
Ces scènes couvrent la période du
- Page 60 and 61: 3.1 IntroductionDans ce chapitre, n
- Page 62 and 63: Figure 3. 1. Évolution de la fract
- Page 64 and 65: 3.2.2 Comparaison de l’évapotran
- Page 66 and 67: 8Champ 176AET(mm/day)5432100 20 40
- Page 68 and 69: Table 3. 2. Comparasion entre l’
- Page 70 and 71: paramètres sont détaillées dans
- Page 72 and 73: ETR,mm/jour876543210estimated actua
- Page 74 and 75: 3.3.3 Partition de l’évapotransp
- Page 76 and 77: T/ET1.20.80.40(T/ETR)est (T/ETR)mes
- Page 79 and 80: 3.4 Application du modèle FAO-56 p
- Page 81 and 82: les valeurs deKCdonnées par Allen
- Page 83 and 84: 1Kc-FAO-56Measured KcCoefficient cu
- Page 85: Kc- irrigation localiseIrrigation-g
- Page 88 and 89: 4.1 IntroductionEn général, l’e
- Page 91: Figure 4. 1. Domaine d’étude ave
- Page 96: 45020406080100120140400350300250200
- Page 99 and 100: ETc simulée, (mm/jour)8642RMSE=0.8
- Page 101 and 102: estimation des besoins en eau par l
- Page 103 and 104: Les travaux menés dans le cadre de
- Page 105 and 106: eau fournie par l’Office Régiona
- Page 107 and 108: REFERENCES BIBLIOGRAPHIQUES91
- Page 109: Barret, DJ., Hatton, TJ., Ash, JE.,
- Page 113 and 114: tests, root flow and diagnostics of
- Page 115 and 116: Katerji, N., and Hallaire, M. 1984:
- Page 117 and 118: Ritchie J.T., 1986. The CERES-Maize
- Page 119 and 120: Wanjura, D. F., and Mahan, J. R., 1
- Page 121 and 122: Un grand nombre de méthodes empiri
- Page 123 and 124: T max : est la température journal
- Page 125 and 126: ANNEXE B : DESCRIPTION DE LAMETHODE
- Page 127 and 128: ρk gw= k wm bρc+ kρdw(1− m bc)