13.07.2015 Views

écologie des virus influenza aviaires en Camargue - IRD

écologie des virus influenza aviaires en Camargue - IRD

écologie des virus influenza aviaires en Camargue - IRD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annexe 2Appar<strong>en</strong>t competitionWith few exceptions, parasitic manipulation dramatically reduces host fitness. Notsurprisingly, manipulative parasites have be<strong>en</strong> shown to be involved in appar<strong>en</strong>t competitionprocesses (see Box 1), like other kinds of parasites. For instance, while the bird trematodeMicrophallus papillorobustus equally infects the two gammarids Gammarus ins<strong>en</strong>sibilis andGammarus aequicauda as (second) intermediate hosts, it does not alter their behaviour withthe same ease [16]. Infected G. ins<strong>en</strong>sibilis are always manipulated, displaying a suicidalbehaviour which increases their probability of predation by aquatic birds. By contrast, in G.aequicauda , host manipulation is observed only wh<strong>en</strong> infection occurs in juv<strong>en</strong>ilegammarids; in adults, M. papillorobustus has no significant effect on the crustacean’sbehaviour. In the field, populations of the two host species exhibit strongly contrastedpatterns of parasite­induced mortality, indicating that M. papillorobustus acts as animportant mechanism regulating the d<strong>en</strong>sity of G. ins<strong>en</strong>sibilis populations only. Interestingly,the latter gammarid species is also known to possess a greater reproductive success than G.aequicauda. The manipulative parasite M. papillorobustus can thus favour the coexist<strong>en</strong>ce ofthe two gammarids wh<strong>en</strong> in sympatry [16].Along the same lines, a study analyzed the effects of bird acanthocephalans(Profilicollis antarcticus and Profilicollis novaezeland<strong>en</strong>sis) on two intertidal shore crabs,Macrophthalmus hirtipes and Hemigrapsus cr<strong>en</strong>ulatus, both species serving as intermediatehosts [17]. The two crab species are common inhabitants of sheltered mudflats in NewZealand and are frequ<strong>en</strong>tly found coexisting. It is typical for these two crab species to avoidpredation by burrowing into the sedim<strong>en</strong>ts at low tide; however, many individuals of bothspecies are also found totally exposed ev<strong>en</strong> wh<strong>en</strong> the tide is at its lowest. Exposed individualsof M. hirtipes (i.e. those still active at low tide), but not H. cr<strong>en</strong>ulatus, have significantlyhigher infection levels than did hidd<strong>en</strong> conspecifics. This result suggests that Profilicolliscystacanths, by altering hiding behaviour, can increase the vulnerability of their intermediatehost M. hirtipes to predation [17]. In this case, the prefer<strong>en</strong>tial manipulation of oneintermediate host species over another can directly influ<strong>en</strong>ce the population dynamics of M.hirtipes and also the relative abundances of other crab species occurring in the same habitat.The role of manipulative parasites in appar<strong>en</strong>t competition ph<strong>en</strong>om<strong>en</strong>a has also be<strong>en</strong>196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!