13.07.2015 Views

écologie des virus influenza aviaires en Camargue - IRD

écologie des virus influenza aviaires en Camargue - IRD

écologie des virus influenza aviaires en Camargue - IRD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Influ<strong>en</strong>za <strong>aviaires</strong> <strong>en</strong> <strong>Camargue</strong>These results dep<strong>en</strong>d both on the bird community dynamics and AIV preval<strong>en</strong>cerecorded in our study site. AIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce is known to vary not only by region, but also byspecies, in which case differ<strong>en</strong>ces are likely to be a result of feeding behavior (Garamszegiand Moller 2007). Our mathematical model follows the assumptions that all species have thesame duration of <strong>virus</strong> excretion, immunity, number of viral particles produced and watercontact rate. More ecological data concerning these aspects are required in order to refinesuch mathematical model. Along the same idea, id<strong>en</strong>tifying habitat heterog<strong>en</strong>eity (e.g.salinity, pH, temperature) is particularly important in order to id<strong>en</strong>tify pot<strong>en</strong>tial hot­spots ofaquatic transmission risks. We are also aware that our model simplify the impacts of birdmigrations in term of introduction and dispersion of <strong>influ<strong>en</strong>za</strong> <strong>virus</strong>es. It seems plausible thatmigrations may explain alone the observed disease dynamics. However, investigations ofsuch aspects would require precise dataset concerning birds movem<strong>en</strong>ts, according to thespecies and periods of the year. Our results highlight that disease dynamics may however notbe driv<strong>en</strong> only by immigration and emigration rates of infected birds.The rec<strong>en</strong>t spread of the HP H5N1 AIV is a matter of concern for public healthauthorities. Despite the fact that the relative contribution of wild water birds in the spread ofthe disease remains controversial (Gauthier­Clerc et al. 2007), the dynamics and pathways of<strong>virus</strong> dispersion has started to become clearer (Kilpatrick et al. 2006). Rec<strong>en</strong>t studiesreporting the effects of wild bird infections with HP H5N1 AIV highlighted that the <strong>virus</strong>replicates (and for a longer time) in the host bird trachea rather than in the digestive tract(Sturm­Ramirez et al. 2005; Brown et al. 2006; Keawcharo<strong>en</strong> et al. 2008) suggesting thatairborne transmission may be more significant for HP than for LP AIV. In artificialconditions (i.e. int<strong>en</strong>sive farming), HP AIV are likely to be transmitted by d<strong>en</strong>sity­ or71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!