Progetto SIMEA - Automatica - Università degli Studi di Padova

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SIMEA Stato dell’arte energetica degli edifici 1.3.13.8. Strengths 104 Doc.No 20100610.SIMEA.MR.03 Versione 1 Allows rapid development of energy simulations, dramatically reducing the time required to build a DOE-2 model. Specifying the building geometry is much faster than other comparable software, making VisualDOE useful for schematic design studies of the building envelope or HVAC systems. Uses DOE-2 as the simulation engine--an industry standard that has been shown to be accurate; implements DOE-2's daylighting calculations; allows input in SI or IP units; imports CADD data to define thermal zones. For advanced users, allows editing of equipment performance curves. Displays a 3D image of the model to help verify accuracy. Allows simple management of up to 99 design alternatives. Experienced DOE-2 users can use VisualDOE to create input files, modify them, and run them from within the program. The interface is designed to be able to incorporate other energy simulation engines like EnergyPlus. A live update program can be used to check and install latest updates via the internet. Responsive technical support is provided. Periodic training sessions are available. 1.3.13.9. Weaknesses VisualDOE implements about 95% of DOE-2.1E functionalities which is adequate for most users. Advanced users familiar with DOE-2.1E can implement the remaining 5% features by modifying the DOE-2 input files generated by VisualDOE.
SIMEA Stato dell’arte energetica degli edifici 1.4. Confronto tra i programmi più usati 1.4.1. Introduzione 105 Doc.No 20100610.SIMEA.MR.03 Versione 1 I programmi sopra riportati descrivono in maniera sintetica le potenzialità e le caratteristiche dei programmi più, utilizzati secondo il numero di utenti. Di tutti i programmi descritti, l’articolo Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs (Crawley, Hand, Kummert and Griffith, 2005) fa un’analisi dettagliata dei 20 programmi più conosciuti e studiati, che sono: BLAST, Bsim, DeST, DOE-2.1E, ECOTECT, Ener-Win, Energy Express, Energy-10, EnergyPlus, e-QUEST, ESP-r, HAP, HEED, IDA ICE, IES, PowerDomus, SUNREL, Tas, TRACE e TRNSYS e li mette a confronto. Di seguito si riportano 14 tabelle che si trovano nella parte finale dell’articolo, le quali riportano in modo schematico il confronto tra i programmi analizzati secondo le caratteristiche generali, i tipi di input che si possono inserire, i risultati in output, le convalide e i programmi che si possono interfacciare ai simulatori. 1.4.2. Tabelle di confronto
Page 1 and 2:
Progetto SIMEA: Sistema Integrato/d
Page 3 and 4:
SIMEA Stato dell’arte energetica
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54: SIMEA Stato dell’arte energetica
Page 103: SIMEA Stato dell’arte energetica
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
show all

Progetto SIMEA - Automatica - Università degli Studi di Padova

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?