20.02.2013 Views

download pdf - Institut für Umweltphysik - Ruprecht-Karls-Universität ...

download pdf - Institut für Umweltphysik - Ruprecht-Karls-Universität ...

download pdf - Institut für Umweltphysik - Ruprecht-Karls-Universität ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2. STRATOSPHERIC OZONE 39<br />

2.2.2 Stratospheric photochemistry of ozone, nitrogen and chlorine species<br />

Participating scientists at IUP Heidelberg Butz, A., M. Dorf, F. Weidner, and K. Pfeilsticker<br />

Abstract In the recent past the LPMA/DOAS balloon payload has conducted several stratospheric<br />

balloon flights at various locations and in different seasons. The inferred abundances of stratospheric<br />

ozone (O3) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) are checked for internal consistency and compared to correlative<br />

data measured by the satellite borne instrument SCIAMACHY.<br />

Figure 2.15: Relative deviations between satellite (retrieved by IUP Bremen) and balloon borne measurements<br />

of O3 (left panel) and NO2 (right panel) vertical profiles. Observation sites and conditions are indicated in the<br />

legend. The mean deviation of all coincident data in the 20 km – 31 km altitude is 4.3% with 10.8% standard<br />

deviation for O3 and 1.8% with 12.4% standard deviation for NO2. The grey lines indicate the mean and the<br />

one and two times standard deviation boundaries with respect to the 20 km – 31 km altitude range. Note the<br />

broken abscissa.<br />

Background Nitrogen oxides dominate the catalytic<br />

destruction of stratospheric O3 between 25<br />

and 40 km altitude. Thus, NO2 and O3 measurements<br />

are of primary importance to study<br />

stratospheric photochemistry. Recent studies indicate<br />

that for selected geophysical conditions the<br />

agreement between measured and modeled O3 and<br />

NO2 is better than 10%. Accordingly, measurements<br />

of high accuracy are required to constrain<br />

or to be compared with photochemical models.<br />

Our study aims at estimating the accuracy of<br />

state-of-the-art remote sensing measurements of<br />

O3 and NO2.<br />

Funding The present work has been supported<br />

by ESA, BMBF, DLR and the European Union.<br />

Methods and results Abundances of stratospheric<br />

O3 and NO2 inferred from traditional<br />

solar occultation measurements of the<br />

LPMA/DOAS balloon payload are checked for internal<br />

consistency and subsequently compared to<br />

collocated observations of the SCanning Imaging<br />

Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY<br />

(SCIAMACHY) onboard the European<br />

Envisat satellite. Our comparison scheme accounts<br />

for the temporal and spatial mismatch (airmass<br />

trajectory modell) as well as for the differing<br />

photochemical conditions (1D chemistry modell)<br />

between the balloon and the satellite borne observations.<br />

The internal agreement of the balloon borne<br />

measurements is 10% and 20% for O3 and NO2,<br />

respectively. Typical deviations between SCIA-<br />

MACHY and the balloon borne data amount to<br />

20% for both gases in the 20 to 30 km altitude<br />

range, see figure (2.15). Below 20 km the agreement<br />

worsens mainly due to lower sensitivity of<br />

the satellite retrieval.<br />

Outlook/Future work<br />

• Extension of the O3 and NO2 validation<br />

study to tropical latitudes<br />

• Case studies of the stratospheric nitrogen<br />

and chlorine budget/partitioning and implications<br />

for ozone loss<br />

• Abundance of iodine radicals in the tropical<br />

upper troposphere and stratosphere<br />

Main publication Butz, A. et al., Intercomparison<br />

of Stratospheric O3 and NO2 abundances<br />

retrieved from balloon borne direct sun observations<br />

and Envisat/SCIAMACHY limb measurements,<br />

Atmos. Chem. Phys. Disc. 5, 10747–<br />

10797, 2005.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!