20.02.2013 Views

download pdf - Institut für Umweltphysik - Ruprecht-Karls-Universität ...

download pdf - Institut für Umweltphysik - Ruprecht-Karls-Universität ...

download pdf - Institut für Umweltphysik - Ruprecht-Karls-Universität ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

64 CHAPTER 2. ATMOSPHERE AND REMOTE SENSING<br />

2.4.7 Two-dimensional measurement of motorway emission plumes<br />

Participating scientist Irene Pundt, Kai Uwe Mettendorf<br />

Abstract A first Long-path Tom-DOAS experiment was carried out in April/May 2001 next to<br />

the German motorway A656 (between Heidelberg and Mannheim), as part of the BAB II campaign<br />

(Fiedler et al., 2001). From the measurements along 16 different light paths vertical profiles on both<br />

sides of the motorway as well as two-dimensional maps of the NO2, SO2 and ozone concentration<br />

distributions could be derived. Emission factors were calculated and compared to model simulations.<br />

Figure 2.31: Left: Tomographic setup used during a motorway emission campaign. From each telescope<br />

one light beam is directed successively towards the eight retro reflectors (circles). Right: NO2<br />

motor vehicle emission plume perpendicular to a motorway (in ppbv). Black bar: Location of the<br />

motorway, chequered area: Experiment towers, wind direction: coming from the left.<br />

Background Traffic emissions are among the<br />

major sources for anthropogenic air pollution.<br />

Volatile compounds and nitrogen oxides (NOx)<br />

are, besides others, important components of<br />

these emissions. Vehicle emission factors are generally<br />

estimated by means of dynamometric test<br />

measurements, but they may change under real<br />

world conditions. Therefore, a couple of field studies,<br />

mostly performed inside tunnels, have been<br />

conducted. However, the air flow through tunnels<br />

is influenced by the moving cars, causing an artificial<br />

wind, which changes the traffic emissions. A<br />

more realistic approach to evaluate emission factors<br />

is to carry out measurements at an open road.<br />

Knowledge of vertical profiles on both sides of the<br />

road is necessary to calculate emission rates (in<br />

molecules s −1 m −1 ). Taking 2D images of the<br />

emission plume perpendicular to the line source<br />

can provide even more information than emission<br />

rates. 2D images can be used to validate 2D<br />

dispersion models, or in the case of short lived<br />

species, to validate 2D chemical transport models.<br />

Funding TOMDOAS (BMBF)<br />

Methods and results The tomographic arrangement<br />

consisted of two long path telescope<br />

sites (one at each side of the motorway), and eight<br />

retro reflector arrays (four on each side at different<br />

heights). Each of the telescopes emitted<br />

one light beam, which was successively directed to<br />

the different retro-reflectors. Altogether 16 different<br />

light paths were realised. 2D NO2 concentration<br />

distributions perpendicular to the motorway<br />

were derived for several time spans (right figure).<br />

Concentrations on the left-hand side of the figure<br />

represent the NO2 background abundance and<br />

the right-hand side the background concentration<br />

plus emissions. For the inversion, an algebraic reconstruction<br />

technique was used in combination<br />

with bilinear basis functions describing the distribution.<br />

The derived emission plumes are, within<br />

the errors, in good agreement with model expectations.<br />

To our knowledge, these are the first measurements<br />

of two dimensional sections of an emission<br />

plume from a line source. Using multibeam<br />

telescopes will increase the time resolution of the<br />

images from hours to minute ranges in the future.<br />

Outlook/Future work SO2 and HCHO emission<br />

rates are currently evaluated and compared<br />

to model simulations. Ozone distributions seem to<br />

be not consistent with model expectations. Further<br />

work is needed to understand the discrepancies.<br />

Main publication Pundt et al. [2005c], Laepple<br />

et al. [2004], Mettendorf [2005]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!