03.03.2013 Views

2000 Hook-up Book - Spirax Sarco

2000 Hook-up Book - Spirax Sarco

2000 Hook-up Book - Spirax Sarco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pressure Reducing Stations<br />

It is a mistake to install even the<br />

best of pressure reducing valves<br />

in a pipeline without giving some<br />

thought to how best it can be<br />

helped to give optimal performance.<br />

The valve selected should be<br />

of such a size that it can handle<br />

the necessary load, but oversizing<br />

should be avoided. The weight<br />

of steam to be handled in a given<br />

time must be calculated or estimated,<br />

and a valve capable of<br />

passing this weight from the<br />

given <strong>up</strong>stream pressure to the<br />

required downstream pressure is<br />

chosen. The valve size is usually<br />

smaller than the steam pipes<br />

either <strong>up</strong>stream or downstream,<br />

because of the high velocities<br />

which accompany the pressure<br />

drop within the valve.<br />

Types of Pressure Reducing<br />

Valves are also important and<br />

can be divided into three gro<strong>up</strong>s<br />

of operation as follows:<br />

Direct Operated Valves<br />

The direct acting valve shown in<br />

Fig. II-17 (page 91) is the simplest<br />

design of reducing valve.<br />

This type of valve has two<br />

drawbacks in that it allows greater<br />

fluctuation of the downstream<br />

pressure under unstable load<br />

demands, and these valves have<br />

relatively low capacity for their<br />

size. It is nevertheless perfectly<br />

adequate for a whole range of<br />

simple applications where accurate<br />

control is not essential and<br />

where the steam flow is fairly<br />

small and constant.<br />

Pilot Operated Valves<br />

Where accurate control of pressure<br />

or large capacity is required,<br />

a pilot operated reducing valve<br />

should be used. Such a valve is<br />

shown in Fig. II-12 (page 89).<br />

The pilot operated design<br />

offers a number of advantages over<br />

the direct acting valve. Only a very<br />

small amount of steam has to flow<br />

through the pilot valve to pressurize<br />

the main diaphragm chamber and<br />

fully open the main valve. Thus,<br />

only very small changes in downstream<br />

pressure are necessary to<br />

produce large changes in flow. The<br />

“droop” of pilot operated valves is<br />

therefore small. Although any rise<br />

in <strong>up</strong>stream pressure will apply an<br />

increased closing force on the main<br />

valve, this is offset by the force of<br />

the <strong>up</strong>stream pressure acting on<br />

the main diaphragm. The result is a<br />

valve which gives close control of<br />

downstream pressure regardless<br />

of variations on the <strong>up</strong>stream side.<br />

Pneumatically Operated<br />

Valves<br />

Pneumatically operated control<br />

valves, Fig. II-20 (page 93), with<br />

actuators and positioners being<br />

piloted by controllers, will provide<br />

pressure reduction with even<br />

more accurate control.<br />

Controllers sense downstream<br />

pressure fluctuations,<br />

interpolate the signals and regulate<br />

an air s<strong>up</strong>ply signal to a<br />

pneumatic positioner which in turn<br />

s<strong>up</strong>plies air to a disphragm opening<br />

a valve. Springs are utilized as<br />

an opposing force causing the<br />

valves to close <strong>up</strong>on a loss or<br />

reduction of air pressure applied<br />

on the diaphragm. Industry<br />

sophistication and control needs<br />

are demanding closer and more<br />

accurate control of steam pressures,<br />

making pneumatic control<br />

valves much more popular today.<br />

Piping And Noise Consideration<br />

The piping around a steam pressure<br />

reducing valve must be<br />

properly sized and fitted for best<br />

operation. Noise level of a reducing<br />

station is lowest when the<br />

valve is installed as follows:<br />

1. Avoid abr<strong>up</strong>t changes in<br />

direction of flow. Use long<br />

radius bends and “Y” piping<br />

instead of “T” connections.<br />

2. Limit approach and exit<br />

steam velocity to 4000 to<br />

6000 FPM.<br />

3. Change piping gradually<br />

Pressure Reducing Stations<br />

before and after the valve with<br />

tapered expanders, or change<br />

pipe only 1 or 2 sizes at a time.<br />

4. Provide long, straight, full-size<br />

runs of heavy wall pipe on<br />

both sides of the valve, and<br />

between two-stage reductions<br />

to stabilize the flow.<br />

5. Use low pressure turndown<br />

ratios (non-critical.)<br />

6. Install vibration absorbing<br />

pipe hangers and acoustical<br />

insulation.<br />

Most noise is generated by a<br />

reducing valve that operates at<br />

critical pressure drop, especially<br />

with high flow requirements.<br />

Fitting a noise diffuser directly to<br />

the valve outlet will reduce the<br />

noise level by approx. 15 dBA.<br />

It must also be remembered<br />

that a valve designed to operate on<br />

steam should not be expected to<br />

work at its best when s<strong>up</strong>plied with<br />

a mixture of steam, water and dirt.<br />

A separator, drained with a<br />

steam trap, will remove almost all<br />

the water from the steam entering<br />

the pressure reducing set. The<br />

baffle type separator illustrated in<br />

Fig. 36 has been found to be very<br />

effective over a broad range of<br />

flows.<br />

Figure 36<br />

Moisture Separator for Steam or Air<br />

19<br />

SYSTEM DESIGN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!