19.03.2013 Views

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Twenty years on, things have changed. Recent public health events, such as<br />

the saRs outbreak and the Walkerton e-coli outbreak, as well as the growing<br />

obesity problem and recognition of the ongoing disparities in health both in<br />

Canada and globally, have reinforced the need for ethical reflection in practice.<br />

The H1n1 influenza pandemic revealed a range of ethical issues most conspicuously<br />

relating to priority setting and data sharing. Each of these events<br />

raised significant ethical issues, some of which were handled well, others for<br />

which it is evident that a better job could have been done.<br />

In this brief introduction, I will highlight some key features of public health<br />

ethics. To that end, I will briefly discuss the differences between public<br />

health ethics and bioethics; address the context of the application of ethics<br />

in public health; outline the role of ethical frameworks and ethical theory;<br />

and examine the growing relevance of public health ethics to public health<br />

policy. I will conclude by arguing for the need for core competencies in public<br />

health ethics.<br />

How is public health ethics different from bioethics?<br />

<strong>Public</strong> health ethics can be differentiated from much-better-known forms of<br />

ethics rooted in biomedicine and the traditions of ethics in the health professions.<br />

Modern health-care ethics takes its departure from the analysis of<br />

ethical issues as they arise in medical practice, particularly in the context of<br />

the application of new technologies in health care. The most influential theoretical<br />

elaboration is a principle-based approach as articulated by Thomas<br />

Beauchamp and James Childress. 1 Their well-known framework requires<br />

weighing and balancing considerations of respect for persons enshrined in<br />

the principle of autonomy, concerns for promoting welfare and well being<br />

through the principle of beneficence, avoiding doing harm as encapsulated<br />

in the principle of non-maleficence and concerns for justice. The first three<br />

principles apply primarily in terms of interactions between individuals;<br />

consideration of them typically plays out in a health-care provider/patient relationship.<br />

Only considerations of justice require the integration of the views<br />

of the broader community. Much bioethics scholarship, therefore, has been<br />

concerned with individual-level ethical issues.<br />

<strong>Public</strong> health ethics focuses more on issues related to the interaction of individuals<br />

and communities, reflecting on collective responsibilities and common<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!