19.03.2013 Views

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

infrastructures are of ethical significance in much the same way human rights<br />

are for individual access to health care and essential medicines for malaria.<br />

Moreover, the idea that medicines and interventions that target a given person<br />

occur in a vacuum is inherently false. Consider the case of a population<br />

where malaria is highly prevalent, as described in the case study. Treatment<br />

or preventive chemoprophylaxis of a person has impacts beyond that individual.<br />

It decreases the population reserve of malaria that can be transmitted to<br />

other persons in the population. Similarly, although a malaria vaccine is not<br />

available at present, current vaccine research against malaria, if successful,<br />

would benefit entire communities, not only the persons who are vaccinated,<br />

by achieving herd immunity for the population and, thereby, vastly decreasing<br />

transmission and epidemics in the entire population. Hence, even for<br />

targeted interventions, the individual choice, human rights and autonomybased<br />

ethics frames neglect such broader and often population-level impact<br />

of a health intervention for any given person.<br />

Standards on development aid and effectiveness:<br />

Reconciling global and regional priorities<br />

While solidarity among nations might, in theory, help overcome injustice due<br />

to malaria’s disproportionate impact on lMICs and tropical, resource-limited<br />

countries, the traditional Westphalian model of independent sovereign nations<br />

may preclude the actual implementation of such solutions. Furthermore,<br />

development aid is often ineffective and does not reach the intended target<br />

populations. In other cases, ‘authoritative aid’ materializes when there is a gap<br />

between what the donor countries want targeted with their aid (e.g., disease<br />

A versus B) and what the local population deems as a priority public health<br />

issue. Such mismatches between aid recipients and donors are an important<br />

ethical issue. Poorly targeted development aid not only results in waste of<br />

scarce resources, it sustains the pressing public health burdens in lMICs.<br />

As a response to this ethical dilemma and to accelerate progress towards the<br />

Millennium Development Goals (MDgs), and recognizing the need to reform<br />

aid delivery and management to achieve improved effectiveness and results,<br />

donor countries and aid organizations have developed a reform, with measurable<br />

recommendations, called the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness.<br />

In 2005, more than 100 signatories, including donor and developing-country<br />

Worldwide and local anti-malaria initiatives<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!