19.03.2013 Views

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Allocating resources fairly is a complex process that involves comparative<br />

cost/benefit evaluation of programs and a prioritization of stakeholder values<br />

with reference to the local context. Health officials must weigh how to best<br />

use funds — should they be used to target protecting the public from harm,<br />

preventing harm, or promoting health?<br />

One can readily imagine how much more disruptive and deadly the Welsh<br />

outbreak might have been, had the public health department been unable to<br />

quickly identify and contain the source of the outbreak. But it is unimaginable<br />

that the public would have accepted the explanation that resources could not<br />

be diverted to the outbreak, because they were being deployed elsewhere for<br />

prevention or promotion. This consideration suggests that the public believes<br />

that its protection in the sense of mitigating actual serious harms caused by<br />

a breach in food safety should be the top priority. This judgment is in alignment<br />

with the “rule of rescue” which demands taking all measures to rescue<br />

victims of disaster or serious disease even when the rescue effort demands<br />

a disproportionate expenditure of resources. 3<br />

However, preventing harm through a food inspection system that monitors<br />

key components of the existing food chain should also be a priority. Effective<br />

prevention spares society the human costs associated with outbreaks.<br />

Although quantifying harms that a food inspection system prevents is problematic,<br />

the systemic costs of inspection can be compared to the costs of<br />

outbreaks. The financial logic operating here is that the burden of paying<br />

low incremental prevention costs is preferable to the burden of paying the<br />

disproportionately large expenditures caused by outbreaks, even though<br />

those incremental costs only reduce the number or possibility of outbreaks.<br />

In the context of food safety, promotion involves changing food processing<br />

procedures and the behaviors of people in the food industry. In the short<br />

run, such transformations are expensive. Moreover, promotion faces the same<br />

challenge as prevention in making palpable the harms that such promotion<br />

will prevent. However, promotion efforts may achieve more prevention and<br />

cost efficiency in the long run.<br />

From an ethical perspective, prioritizing protection over prevention and promotion<br />

is consistent with the common intuition that avoiding serious harm<br />

generally takes precedent over acquiring a benefit. However, when the risk of<br />

An E.coli outbreak in Wales<br />

129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!