19.03.2013 Views

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

esulting financial and scientific partnerships among malaria-affected countries<br />

and developed countries promote the transfer of expertise and tend to<br />

reduce inequalities.<br />

This fund and these partnerships have become the primary tools in the<br />

fight against malaria, and direct effects attributable to the investment have<br />

been rapidly demonstrated. In total, 190 million insecticide-treated mosquito<br />

nets have been distributed and 7.7 million lives have been saved. It is estimated<br />

that $us 4.2 billion are needed to fight malaria every year. To ensure<br />

transparency and share knowledge, the progress achieved by these projects<br />

is reported in the Roll Back Malaria Progress & Impact Series, available at<br />

www.rbm.who.int/ProgressImpactSeries/index.html.<br />

Scenario shift<br />

Contributions to the fund remain vulnerable in times of economic crisis, when<br />

external donors are tempted to reduce international assistance. Any delay in<br />

field interventions may diminish the effectiveness of the eradication methods<br />

used. Indeed, resistance of the parasite to anti-malaria treatments and<br />

of the mosquito to insecticide have been observed in a number of countries.<br />

Immediate, intensive, sustained intervention, independent of the vagaries of<br />

the financial markets, could free humanity from this health burden that is<br />

so unequally borne. Conversely, any slowdown in field interventions could<br />

lead to continued loss of human life in affected countries and continued expenditures<br />

for intervention and treatment by all countries. Moreover, if the<br />

intervention tools now used were to become less effective, that could have<br />

negative impacts on the perceived legitimacy of the solicitation and deployment<br />

of major financial resources worldwide.<br />

Questions for discussion<br />

1 Is the concept of a right to health a sufficient basis for a duty to intervene<br />

in the case presented? Can this concept be applied in the<br />

same way in other contexts, for example, to public health programs<br />

in developed countries?<br />

2 What should the eligibility criteria be for proposals submitted to the<br />

fund? What should the evaluation mechanisms be for these criteria?<br />

Worldwide and local anti-malaria initiatives<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!