19.03.2013 Views

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case<br />

A Body Mass Index (BMI) surveillance programme (heights/weights) will be<br />

implemented by public health nurses in a representative sample of elementary<br />

schools (children aged 4–11 years). Passive (‘opt out’) consent (with forms<br />

mailed to children’s homes) will provide robust and representative populationlevel<br />

statistics and contribute to the development of evidence-based public<br />

health programs and policy.<br />

It can be argued that surveillance is justified because obesity is a highly<br />

prevalent, serious health issue with an acceptable measure (BMI) and an excellent<br />

opportunity for data collection. Schools are a logical measurement site<br />

because they reach virtually all children. To do nothing might be thought to<br />

be analogous to causing harm. However, ethical issues could raise objections<br />

to the program. These include whether:<br />

1 possible stigmatization of obese children may pose risks to their<br />

health;<br />

2 screening rather than surveillance should be introduced so children<br />

identified as “at risk” can be followed up;<br />

3 active consent should be sought because of the risk of harm to children<br />

within the program, and;<br />

4 the use of BMI measurements may lead to confusing messages by<br />

increasing the legitimacy of using weigh scales at the same time as<br />

public health messages are telling people to ‘put away the scale, adopt<br />

healthy behaviours that will improve overall health.’<br />

These objections can each be addressed:<br />

1 Stigmatization will be minimized by ensuring confidentiality through<br />

use of a privacy screen, careful control of records (e.g, codes, locked<br />

forms), training and strict adherence to protocols. Care will be taken<br />

to ensure children do not see results (e.g. having them stand on the<br />

scale backwards). Children (or parents) who request results will be<br />

referred to their doctors. An important justification for not providing<br />

the data to the child or parents, as would be required if this were a<br />

screening process, is the risk to confidentiality if information is given<br />

to the children to transmit to parents.<br />

Obesity Surveillance in School Children<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!