19.03.2013 Views

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

intervention (say reduction in mortality or decrease in disability or quality<br />

adjusted life years.) Consequentialism seems a natural analog to the metricdriven<br />

aspects of public health practice rooted in epidemiology.<br />

Liberalism, on the other hand, is rooted in the claims of individuals to have<br />

inherent value and worth. Originating in the deontological perspective of<br />

Immanuel Kant, liberalism places high value on protecting and promoting<br />

individual liberty. This is manifest concretely in the wide range of rights that<br />

are protected and promoted under international human rights codes.<br />

Communitarianism focuses on the qualities and characteristics of communities<br />

that make them salutary. It focuses on the structure of communities<br />

that are health promoting and analyzes the character traits and virtues that<br />

should be aspired to and encouraged in citizens.<br />

There are now a wider variety of normative theories relevant to public health<br />

ethics. Feminism brings a lens of gender to the analysis of ethical issues in<br />

public health. How do policies and programs work toward promoting gender<br />

equality and reducing the oppression of women? Paul Farmer has argued for<br />

the importance of integrating social sciences perspectives, particularly anthropology,<br />

to examine the role of oppression in understanding health issues. 5<br />

Recently, considerable attention has been devoted to the existence of inequities<br />

leading to disparities in access to health and health outcomes. 6 Many of these<br />

disparities are rooted in the social determinants of health. The existence of<br />

marked disparities has lead to the analysis of the relationship between social<br />

justice and public health. Powers and Faden elaborate a theory of social justice<br />

capable of informing the moral foundation of public health ethics. 7 They are<br />

critical of accounts of justice in public health that focus exclusively on outcomes<br />

derived from considerations of utility. Instead, they argue that a social justice<br />

perspective addresses the twin moral impulses that animate public health:<br />

“to improve human well being by improving health and to do so in<br />

particular by focusing on the needs of those who are the most disadvantaged.<br />

A commitment to social justice…attaches a special moral<br />

urgency to remediating the conditions of those whose life prospects<br />

are poor across multiple dimensions of well being. Placing a priority<br />

on those so situated is a hallmark of social justice” [p.82]. 7<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!