19.03.2013 Views

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

practice<br />

harm is remote, the cost/benefit balance can shift in favor of the long term<br />

advantages of prevention and promotion. In such instances, the challenge of<br />

public health is twofold: to make the case that long term advantages outweigh<br />

more immediate but less serious harms and costs, while at the same time not<br />

losing sight of the fact that the success of prevention can lull one into forgetting<br />

the importance of maintaining an adequate inspection system.<br />

Responsibility for correcting the failure of the regulatory oversight system is<br />

shared. 4 Elected officials are responsible for ensuring adequate funding. <strong>Public</strong><br />

health officials are responsible for implementing preventive measures and<br />

for providing adequate training. But what is the role of the public? The public<br />

has a duty to engage in responsible civic response to public health problems.<br />

The role of civic responsibility has been widely discussed in the literature on<br />

public health emergency preparedness and response, including obligations<br />

of the public to be prepared for emergencies and to make informed choices. 5<br />

Lessons learned from this literature need to be adapted and incorporated into<br />

thinking about broader prevention issues, including how public health can<br />

successfully engage the public on such matters and develop trust.<br />

Scenario Shifts<br />

The case asks us to consider how the ethical issues would change in the context<br />

of the following hypothetical scenarios:<br />

» The inspectors were well-trained, competent, and able to detect problems,<br />

but they believed the organizational system in which they<br />

worked placed the public at risk due to its ineffectiveness; or<br />

» The system was functional and was able to identify the ineffective performance<br />

of the inspectors through monitoring their performance; or<br />

» The business involved was categorized as presenting a lower risk<br />

to the public due to not servicing vulnerable groups (i.e, children,<br />

through school lunches; hospital patients; and the elderly, through<br />

nursing homes and meals-on-wheels).<br />

In the original scenario, neither the food inspectors nor the system functioned<br />

adequately. The first two scenario shifts, which represent situations where<br />

either the inspectors or the system is functional, have the effect of shifting<br />

both culpability and responsibility.<br />

PoPulation anD <strong>Public</strong> <strong>HealtH</strong> <strong>etHics</strong><br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!