PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

More documents

Recommendations

Info

case 7 page 81 case 8 page 92 case 9 page 103 case 10 page 114 Worldwide and Local Anti-malaria Initiatives by Lise Lévesque Case discussion by Vural Özdemir, Denise Avard and Bartha Knoppers First Nations Drinking Water Policies by Mona Shum, Donna Atkinson and Chris Kaposy Case discussion by Ted Schrecker School Based HPV Vaccination for Girls in Ontario by Alison Thompson and Jessica Polzer Case discussion by Laura Shanner Mandatory Immunization of Local Public Health Employees by Michelle Murti and Lisa Berger Case discussion by Kumanan Wilson Part tHree Practice case 11 page 123 case 12 page 133 case 13 page 144 case 14 page 153 case 15 page 164 case 16 page 176 An E.coli Outbreak in Wales – A Failure in Regulatory and Professional Ethics by Thomas Tenkate and Meredith C. Schwartz Case discussion by Leonard Ortmann and Drue Barrett Use of Evidence for Program Decision Making: Resources for Tobacco Cessation by Donna Ciliska, Megan Ward and Sheila Datta Case discussion by Bashir Jiwani Using Personalized Letters of Invitation to Increase Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening by France Filiatrault, Michel Désy and Isabelle Laporte Case discussion by Raymond Massé Health Inequities in First Nations Communities and Canada’s Response to the H1n1 Influenza Pandemic by Donna Atkinson, Mona Shum, Chris Kaposy and Margo Greenwood Case discussion by Nicholas King Alberta Oil Sands: A Toxic Mixture of Bitumen and Economic Prosperity by Monique Sedgwick and Sharon Yanicki Case discussion by Colin Soskolne Whose Role is it to Deal with Societal Determinants of Health? The Case of the Nigerian Lead-poisoning Epidemic by John D. Pringle and Donald C. Cole Case discussion by Colin Soskolne
acknowleDgeMents The Partners would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their generous contributions of time and expertise to Population and Public Health Ethics: Cases from Research, Policy, and Practice: » The Core Project Lead, Sarah Viehbeck (Senior Evaluation Associate, CIHR-IPPH) » The Population and Public Health Ethics Casebook Advisory Committee: › François Benoit and Christopher McDougall, National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy; › Sheila Chapman (from October, 2011), CIHR; › Norman Daniels (CIHR-IPPH Institute Advisory Board member, Harvard University); › Nancy Edwards (Scientific Director, CIHR-IPPH), and; › Nancy Ondrusek and Don Willison, Public Health Ontario » The thoughtful and committed peer reviewers of the selected cases (listed alphabetically): Drue Barrett; Ronald Bayer; Solomon Benetar; Emma Cohen; Bernard Dickens; Ruth Gaare-Bernheim; Heather Greenwood; Bashir Jiwani; Nicholas King; Bartha Knoppers; Jaro Kotalik; Alan Melnick; Stephanie Morain; Stephanie Nixon; Leonard Ortmann; Ann Robertson; Ted Schrecker; Michael Selgelid; Laura Shanner; Colin Soskolne; Elaine Wiersma, and; Kumanan Wilson » The authors of the featured cases and the accompanying case analyses » Natalie Olsen of Kisscut Design for graphic design services; Heather Blumenthal for editing, and; Edgar for translation » Erica Di Ruggiero, Emma Cohen, Jennifer Morgan, Chardé Morgan and Marina Irick from the CIHR and Michael Keeling from the National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy for their contributions to the casebook production and dissemination. 5
Page 1 and 2: PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics
Page 3: contents Acknowledgements - page 5
Page 8 and 9: » Create a tool to support instruc
Page 10 and 11: Each of the discussants took on thi
Page 12 and 13: Twenty years on, things have change
Page 14 and 15: intervention (say reduction in mort
Page 16 and 17: ethics understands dilemmas not onl
Page 18 and 19: priority setting. 17 Once more, usi
Page 20 and 21: 6 See for example the WHO Commissio
Page 22 and 23: obesity surveillance in scHool cHil
Page 24 and 25: esearch 2 Inevitably children will
Page 26 and 27: esearch Case discussion in response
Page 28 and 29: It would be ideal to get active inf
Page 30 and 31: esearch participation, leading to a
Page 32 and 33: to sHare or not to sHare? Secondary
Page 34 and 35: esearch Scenario shift » What if t
Page 36 and 37: esearch Many different parties have
Page 38 and 39: esearch of his concern for people w
Page 40 and 41: esearcH etHics anD conFlicts oF int
Page 42 and 43: esearch and non-public information
Page 44 and 45: esearch reFerences 1 Public Health
Page 46 and 47: esearch Key ethical dimensions Perh
Page 48 and 49: esearch such support, seen across t
Page 50 and 51: esearch Proposed resolution Enablin
Page 52 and 53: a tool For etHical analysis oF Publ
Page 54 and 55:
esearch are explicit. In Quebec, su
Page 56 and 57:
esearch reFerences 1 Bayer, R. and
Page 58 and 59:
Part two Policy
Page 60 and 61:
policy being increasingly introduce
Page 62 and 63:
policy behaviour. Therefore, the et
Page 64 and 65:
policy 18 Chapman, S. and Freeman,
Page 66 and 67:
policy through outdoor smoking, any
Page 68 and 69:
policy that this is an injustice. W
Page 70 and 71:
DeFerring blooD Donation FroM Men w
Page 72 and 73:
policy 26 per cent of new infection
Page 74 and 75:
policy 6 NHS Blood and Transplant.
Page 76 and 77:
policy public trust might also incl
Page 78 and 79:
policy lived in certain regions in
Page 80 and 81:
policy 4 Zou, S., Musavi, F., Notar
Page 82 and 83:
policy Case description For nearly
Page 84 and 85:
policy 3 Economic conditions could
Page 86 and 87:
policy essential to examine the his
Page 88 and 89:
policy lMICs. Evidence-based introd
Page 90 and 91:
policy governments, regional develo
Page 92 and 93:
First nations Drinking water Polici
Page 94 and 95:
policy federal government was aware
Page 96 and 97:
policy reFerences 1 Health Canada.
Page 98 and 99:
policy Core issue Case study author
Page 100 and 101:
policy Additional issues It may be
Page 102 and 103:
policy Arguably, an exception might
Page 104 and 105:
policy Case Following the pharmaceu
Page 106 and 107:
policy 3 What potential harms may b
Page 108 and 109:
policy in the “anti-cancer vaccin
Page 110 and 111:
policy adults may choose for themse
Page 112 and 113:
policy Men also suffer some HPV-cau
Page 114 and 115:
ManDatory iMMunization oF local Pub
Page 116 and 117:
policy for exemptions and declinati
Page 118 and 119:
policy Case discussion in response
Page 120 and 121:
policy the degree of infringement o
Page 122 and 123:
Part tHree Practice
Page 124 and 125:
practice Case The Inquiry found tha
Page 126 and 127:
practice Questions for discussion 1
Page 128 and 129:
practice is a basic ethical obligat
Page 130 and 131:
practice harm is remote, the cost/b
Page 132 and 133:
practice that the professional plac
Page 134 and 135:
practice or equitably reaching your
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
practice In what follows, I will de
Page 140 and 141:
practice will end up having to comp
Page 142 and 143:
practice Getting Clear on What’s
Page 144 and 145:
using PersonalizeD letters oF invit
Page 146 and 147:
practice Cervical cancer is relativ
Page 148 and 149:
practice Case discussion in respons
Page 150 and 151:
practice principle should only be t
Page 152 and 153:
practice potentially cause the gene
Page 154 and 155:
practice Nations’ constitutional
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
practice sanitation and poor housin
Page 162 and 163:
practice Decision making While the
Page 164 and 165:
alberta oil sanDs A toxic mixture o
Page 166 and 167:
practice resolution calling for the
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
practice Second, the process of oil
Page 172 and 173:
practice contributing to “contrac
Page 174 and 175:
practice How might the decision and
Page 176 and 177:
wHose role is it to Deal witH socie
Page 178 and 179:
practice same artisanal miners to d
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
practice The ethical principle of b
Page 184 and 185:
practice Identify the options avail
show all

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?