19.03.2013 Views

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

PoPulationand Public HealtH etHics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

for individuals living in substandard, overcrowded homes where infectious<br />

diseases are more likely to spread.<br />

<strong>Public</strong> health emergencies such as the 2009 H1N1 pandemic highlight governments’<br />

ethical responsibilities towards vulnerable populations. Most people<br />

recognize that the government had a responsibility to provide the H1N1 vaccine.<br />

But the consequences of poverty, such as inadequate water supply and<br />

overcrowded housing, created difficulties for an adequate pandemic response<br />

within Aboriginal communities. Canada’s response to the pandemic could<br />

have been improved had the government taken responsibility for alleviating<br />

these poverty-based health inequities prior to the outbreak.<br />

While many of the negative experiences of the spring outbreak improved<br />

Canada’s response in the fall outbreak, poor living conditions such as overcrowding<br />

and a lack of running water were not addressed. 14-16 Instead,<br />

responses to the fall outbreak included large shipments of body bags to<br />

many remote First Nations communities, with a negative and well-publicized<br />

reaction. 12 During the spring and summer outbreak, more than one-quarter<br />

(25.6%) of the approximately 168 patients admitted to hospitals across Canada<br />

for H1N1 influenza were of Aboriginal ancestry, 13 even though they make up<br />

only about 4% of the Canadian population. 17 In remote communities, high<br />

rates of H1N1 infection also placed significant pressure on air ambulance services,<br />

with 76 patients requiring medivac services from northern Manitoba<br />

alone at the cost of $5,000 per patient. 18<br />

Scenario shift<br />

Consider whether the circumstances of this case would be different if:<br />

» a non-Aboriginal remote community experienced high rates of H1N1<br />

infections, serious cases and deaths from a lack of clean running water<br />

and basic sanitation;<br />

» the government invests funding to build a tertiary care facility accessible<br />

to surrounding First Nations to provide more cost-effective health<br />

services in remote communities. However, no additional funds are<br />

provided to improve housing, sanitation and water systems. Would<br />

this be an improvement?<br />

Health Inequities in First Nations Communities and Canada’s Response to the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!