22.03.2013 Views

Final Technical Report: - Southwest Fisheries Science Center - NOAA

Final Technical Report: - Southwest Fisheries Science Center - NOAA

Final Technical Report: - Southwest Fisheries Science Center - NOAA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 19. Data type (remotely sensed [RS] or combined remotely sensed and in situ [CB]) and number of sightings<br />

used to build, validate, and parameterize the final models for the CCE. The sightings used to build the final models<br />

are from the SWFSC’s 1991, 1993, 1996, and 2001 surveys of the CCE. Sightings from SWFSC’s 2005 survey<br />

were used to validate the best models. The best models were re-fit to all years of data (i.e. 1991-2005) to<br />

parameterize the final predictive models. Numbers reflect sightings for which remotely sensed SST data were<br />

available (remotely sensed models) or for which both the remotely sensed and in situ grid data were available<br />

(combined models). The numbers reflect sightings in Beaufort sea states 0-5.<br />

Species<br />

Data<br />

Type<br />

81<br />

Total number of sightings<br />

build validate re-fit<br />

Striped dolphin RS 51 23 74<br />

Short-beaked common dolphin CB 298 87 385<br />

Risso’s dolphin RS 90 13 103<br />

Pacific white-sided dolphin CB 49 4 53<br />

Northern right whale dolphin CB 56 5 61<br />

Dall’s porpoise CB 311 50 361<br />

Sperm whale CB 47 21 68<br />

Fin whale RS 152 86 238<br />

Blue whale CB 157 24 181<br />

Humpback whale RS 98 52 150<br />

Baird’s beaked whale RS 13 5 18<br />

Small beaked whales RS 68 11 79<br />

Model validation using the novel 2005 dataset revealed that the models for Risso’s<br />

dolphin and Baird’s beaked whale were not effective at capturing their distribution patterns,<br />

indicating that the models required re-examination and subsequent replacement of continuous<br />

habitat predictors with static variables (see Section 4.7). Models for both species were<br />

substantially improved using the static variables; the final models for all species showed that<br />

density estimates were similar to those derived by Barlow (2003) using line-transect analyses<br />

(Table 20).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!