22.03.2013 Views

Final Technical Report: - Southwest Fisheries Science Center - NOAA

Final Technical Report: - Southwest Fisheries Science Center - NOAA

Final Technical Report: - Southwest Fisheries Science Center - NOAA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

for the individual ecosystems. These analyses also suggest that habitat preference is<br />

similar for short-beaked common dolphins, which are characterized as a habitat specialist<br />

in the ETP (Reilly and Fiedler 1994), in both cool-temperate and tropical ecosystems. In<br />

contrast, striped dolphins, which are characterized as a habitat generalist in the ETP<br />

(Reilly and Fiedler 1994), appear to have different habitat preferences. These results<br />

suggest a general hypothesis that species habitat selectivity, which is related to the<br />

breadth of a species niche, in low productivity ecosystems may determine whether their<br />

habitat preferences are the same across multiple ecosystems.<br />

4.4 Variance Estimation<br />

One advantage of predictive density models, compared to simple stratified linetransect<br />

analyses, is the ability to estimate variance at a finer spatial resolution. This<br />

provides useful information on areas where abundance estimates are likely to vary the<br />

most (or least). Geographic contour plots showing annual model predictions, multi-year<br />

average densities, standard errors, and lognormal 90% confidence intervals are shown in<br />

Appendix A for cetaceans in the CCE and in Appendix B for cetaceans in the ETP.<br />

The greatest source of variability was attributable to the strong inter-annual<br />

variability in oceanographic conditions (See Section 4.1). In contrast, the specific<br />

methods used to build the models were a small source of variability among model<br />

predictions. For example, plots of predicted average ETP striped dolphin density and the<br />

associated estimates of standard error and lognormal 90% confidence intervals derived<br />

from the complex vs. simple encounter rate (53.4 vs. 22.5 effective degrees of freedom)<br />

and group size (17.9 vs. 12.6 effective degrees of freedom) models are nearly<br />

indistinguishable (Fig. 19 and 20, respectively).<br />

In the CCE region, uncertainty was generally greater off Oregon and Washington,<br />

where fewer surveys were conducted (1991 and 1993 surveys were only conducted off<br />

California). Variance was also greater for species with a large range in group size, e.g.<br />

short-beaked common dolphins, and smaller for large whale species and Dall's porpoises,<br />

which occur in smaller groups (Fig. 21). Similar patterns of variance were evident for the<br />

ETP, where estimates of uncertainty were greatest in areas where survey effort was least<br />

(for example, around the margins of the study areas), and for species having the greatest<br />

range in encounter rate and group size (for example, spotted, striped, eastern spinner, and<br />

whitebelly spinner dolphins).<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!