Final Technical Report: - Southwest Fisheries Science Center - NOAA
Final Technical Report: - Southwest Fisheries Science Center - NOAA
Final Technical Report: - Southwest Fisheries Science Center - NOAA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
for the individual ecosystems. These analyses also suggest that habitat preference is<br />
similar for short-beaked common dolphins, which are characterized as a habitat specialist<br />
in the ETP (Reilly and Fiedler 1994), in both cool-temperate and tropical ecosystems. In<br />
contrast, striped dolphins, which are characterized as a habitat generalist in the ETP<br />
(Reilly and Fiedler 1994), appear to have different habitat preferences. These results<br />
suggest a general hypothesis that species habitat selectivity, which is related to the<br />
breadth of a species niche, in low productivity ecosystems may determine whether their<br />
habitat preferences are the same across multiple ecosystems.<br />
4.4 Variance Estimation<br />
One advantage of predictive density models, compared to simple stratified linetransect<br />
analyses, is the ability to estimate variance at a finer spatial resolution. This<br />
provides useful information on areas where abundance estimates are likely to vary the<br />
most (or least). Geographic contour plots showing annual model predictions, multi-year<br />
average densities, standard errors, and lognormal 90% confidence intervals are shown in<br />
Appendix A for cetaceans in the CCE and in Appendix B for cetaceans in the ETP.<br />
The greatest source of variability was attributable to the strong inter-annual<br />
variability in oceanographic conditions (See Section 4.1). In contrast, the specific<br />
methods used to build the models were a small source of variability among model<br />
predictions. For example, plots of predicted average ETP striped dolphin density and the<br />
associated estimates of standard error and lognormal 90% confidence intervals derived<br />
from the complex vs. simple encounter rate (53.4 vs. 22.5 effective degrees of freedom)<br />
and group size (17.9 vs. 12.6 effective degrees of freedom) models are nearly<br />
indistinguishable (Fig. 19 and 20, respectively).<br />
In the CCE region, uncertainty was generally greater off Oregon and Washington,<br />
where fewer surveys were conducted (1991 and 1993 surveys were only conducted off<br />
California). Variance was also greater for species with a large range in group size, e.g.<br />
short-beaked common dolphins, and smaller for large whale species and Dall's porpoises,<br />
which occur in smaller groups (Fig. 21). Similar patterns of variance were evident for the<br />
ETP, where estimates of uncertainty were greatest in areas where survey effort was least<br />
(for example, around the margins of the study areas), and for species having the greatest<br />
range in encounter rate and group size (for example, spotted, striped, eastern spinner, and<br />
whitebelly spinner dolphins).<br />
61