Autobiography - The Galindo Group
Autobiography - The Galindo Group
Autobiography - The Galindo Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Ram <strong>Galindo</strong> THE MAKING OF AN AMERICAN Page 151<br />
<strong>The</strong> old adage that in real estate everything is “location, location, location” is<br />
incomplete. Location is no doubt important, whether we speak about a primary<br />
development such as BCMUD1, or an end of stream development such as a hotel in a<br />
bustling area of town. But location alone does not ensure success and some<br />
exceptionally good projects, like Aerofit Villa Maria, are successful even in non-prime<br />
locations. Other factors such as adequate capitalization and credibility, the quality of the<br />
business plan and the people in charge of executing it are of great importance as I have<br />
shown above. But even their combined sum does not ensure success either.<br />
<strong>The</strong> key factor is timing, and this is probably the hardest to control because it is too<br />
dependent on macroeconomic factors. Although an entrepreneur can try to accelerate<br />
or delay some decisions to fit the movements of the economy, the adjustments under<br />
his or her control are on a vernier scale only, affecting just a small band of the timeline.<br />
Ultimately it appears that the luck factor, more sophisticated scholars call it randomness<br />
of nature, comes into play. Throughout my career I have been visited by very good luck<br />
and by bad business luck. <strong>The</strong> one force that weaves through both situations is<br />
optimism. So, I have learned to be an inveterate optimist and I pervade all my business<br />
deals with an aura of cautious optimism. It is the fourth foundation pier of my recovery.<br />
As I said on My Creed (Chapter 1), – “If in trying I fail, I ask for the chance to try again.”<br />
I did. America gave me the chance.<br />
Continuing to connect my experiences to the cloth of America, I must comment on<br />
related lessons learned. One observation worthy of discussion at the public policy level<br />
relates to development criteria adopted by some cities. In some cases, such as the City<br />
of Austin and its peripheral suburbs, as the residents’ affluency increases, the initiatives<br />
of the environmentalist community are adopted for application to new construction,<br />
always making sure that those already there are exempted from these new obligations.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se initiatives translate into building ordinances usually derived from penumbral<br />
interpretations of federal laws such as the endangered species act, the wetlands act,<br />
the clean waters act and other similar outreaches of the Washington bureaucracy.<br />
Specific instances that have escalated my construction costs from one project to the<br />
next are in the realm of storm water filtering, tree replacement, buffer zone treatments,<br />
disturbed land restoration and wild life reserves. <strong>The</strong> bottom line is that the income<br />
necessary to qualify as a renter in a new apartment, which is not any different than one<br />
two years older, is significantly higher. This higher income requirement automatically<br />
disqualifies the poorer people from living in the community, thereby producing clearer<br />
lines of socioeconomic segregation. <strong>The</strong> wealthier residents of the city still want the<br />
benefit of cheaper labor, but are unwilling to let them live in their neighborhoods. Thus,<br />
the poorer people must move further out to unregulated communities, with consequent<br />
problems of transportation, education, medical care and other social services magnified<br />
again.<br />
<strong>Autobiography</strong>.doc 151 of 239