26.03.2013 Views

Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...

Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...

Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48 Legal History in the Making<br />

I (1165-1214) when it appears as one of the pleas of the crown, excepted<br />

from the grant of Annandale to Robert de Brus: 'Exceptis regalibus que ad<br />

regalitatem meam spectant Scilicet . . . Causa de murdra'. 27 At this time it<br />

presumably bore its original meaning of a secret killing. <strong>The</strong> earliest known<br />

classification of homicide in Scots law occurs in the treatise known as Regiam<br />

Majestatem, once thought to date from the first half of the thirteenth century,<br />

but now dated later, probably to the years shortly after 1318. This section of<br />

the Regiam is lifted almost verbatim from 'Glanvill's' De Legibus, compiled<br />

over a century previously, and reflects the ancient use of the term 'murder' to<br />

denote a secret killing:<br />

Duo autem genera sunt homicidii: unum quod dicitur murdrum quod nullo vidente<br />

vel sciente clam perpetratur . . . secundum genus homicidii est illud quod dicitur<br />

simplex homicidium. 28<br />

'Murder', therefore, is contrasted in the Regiam with 'simple' homicide.<br />

<strong>The</strong> next evidence for the classification of homicide in Scotland comes from<br />

two well known statutes of 1369/70 and 1371/72. <strong>The</strong> 1370 statute of David<br />

II enacted that the king should not grant a remission for homicide until an<br />

inquest had determined whether the killing had been committed per murthyr<br />

vel per praecogitatam malitiam. 29 <strong>The</strong> statute of Robert II, two years later<br />

- perhaps rather statutes, as there are a number of separate provisions -<br />

follows the same classification, and enacts that when homicide has been<br />

committed an inquest or assize should determine whether the killing was<br />

committed ex certo et deliberato proposito vel per forthouchfelony sive murthir<br />

vel ex calore iracundiae viz chaudemellee . 30 <strong>The</strong> 1372 statute also uses the<br />

shorter formulation of per forthouchfelony vel per murthir in contrast to per<br />

chaudemellee: if the assize finds forethocht felony or murder then sentence<br />

is to be carried out without delay; if, on the other hand, it finds chaudmellee<br />

the accused is to have the exceptions and defences already permitted by<br />

law and custom - 'habebit dilaciones et defensiones legitimas et debitas per<br />

leges Regni et consuetudines hactenus approbatas'. <strong>The</strong> statute continues<br />

that in the case of a killer seeking sanctuary an assize should determine<br />

whether the deed was per murthir sive per forthouchfelony or whether it<br />

was per chaudemelle. Only in the latter case should benefit of sanctuary be<br />

allowed.<br />

Two near contemporary formularies, the Bute manuscript and Formulary<br />

E, show that these statutes were no dead letter. Each contains a style directing<br />

the holding of an inquest to determine whether someone had killed another by<br />

27 Regesta Regum Scottorum II: <strong>The</strong> Acts of William I, G.W.S. Barrow, ed. (Edinburgh, 1971), 179.<br />

28 Regiam Majestatem, Lord Cooper, ed., Stair Society, xi (Edinburgh, 1947), iv, 5; (iv, 4 in the<br />

A[cts of the] Parliaments of] S[cotland], T. Thomson and Cosmo Innes, ed. (Record Commission,<br />

1814-75), 633. And see Glanvill, G.D.H. Hall, ed. (1965), xiv, 3.<br />

29 A.P.S., i, 509.<br />

30 A.P.S.,i, 547-48.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!