Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...
Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...
Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 2<br />
<strong>The</strong> Presentation of Cases in Medieval Chancery Bills<br />
Timothy S. Haskett<br />
<strong>The</strong> medieval chancery bill is a petition, an instrument by means of which<br />
a person who believes that he has no common law remedy, or that an<br />
existing remedy is ineffective, asks the chancellor of England to provide<br />
redress. 1 Such bills survive from the late fourteenth century onwards in great<br />
numbers, sufficient, in fact, to warrant their collection into a separate class<br />
in the Public Record Office as C 1, Early Chancery Proceedings. <strong>The</strong>re are<br />
perhaps 90,000 cases in C 1 for the period before 1500, but problems apart<br />
from the sheer bulk of the material have limited scholarly assessment of<br />
these records, even though they constitute the main body of evidence for<br />
the activity of the medieval court of chancery. Usually, although by no<br />
means always, the bill is the only documentation for a case, there being only<br />
scattered depositions, writs and other miscellaneous related material in the C<br />
1 bundles. And the bills themselves are for the most part not dated directly;<br />
they are addressed to a chancellor identified by his bishopric alone, and could<br />
thus be placed in a variety of periods. Notwithstanding that further work in C<br />
1 and other fifteenth-century chancery records will surely improve both our<br />
general understanding of the medieval court of chancery and of individual<br />
cases therein, it remains that the bills themselves are legitimately the subject of<br />
a precise diplomatic analysis. As the paramount primary source for the court,<br />
they are quite eloquent, but only in certain respects. <strong>The</strong> purpose of this study<br />
is to demonstrate how an analysis of the way in which cases are presented in the<br />
chancery bills may advance our understanding of several important aspects of<br />
the court. It is based on a group of 200 chancery bills, selected because they can<br />
- unusually - be dated precisely: they were submitted between 1432 and 1443,<br />
during the tenure of Chancellor John Stafford, bishop of Bath and Wells. 2<br />
<strong>The</strong> medieval chancery bill displays a distinct canon of form, and this form<br />
1 <strong>The</strong> author would like to thank Professor J.H. Baker for several important suggestions concerning<br />
this essay. Any errors that may remain are, of course, the author's own.<br />
2 <strong>The</strong>y are found in Bundle 9 of the Early Chancery Proceedings, hence C 1/9. For a complete<br />
description of the records that pertain to the medieval court of chancery, see T.S. Haskett, <strong>The</strong> 'Equity'<br />
Side of the English Court of Chancery in the Late Middle Ages: A Method of Approach, (Diss. University<br />
of Toronto, 1987), 42-82. Unlike the vast majority of medieval chancery bills, these 200 display a<br />
memorandum of surety on their faces which provides the precise day, month and regnal year that two men<br />
undertook in chancery to stand surety for the verity of the petitioner's case (see the appended texts).