26.03.2013 Views

Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...

Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...

Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

214 Legal History in the Making<br />

he wrote, seemed to offer the prospect of bringing order into the mass of<br />

impressions gained from contemplation of life in society. We may reasonably<br />

attempt to distinguish between cultural types, to note recurring sequences of<br />

development and to suggest reasons why these types and sequences present<br />

themselves not on identical, but on parallel or divergent lines. 7 <strong>The</strong> early<br />

positivists, Comte and Spencer, proclaimed the advent of a sociology destined<br />

to encompass the whole range of natural sciences as the crowning effort of<br />

human knowledge. Later thinkers in Vinogradoff s day, including Vinogradoff<br />

himself, were not so optimistic but made many reservations and restrictions.<br />

As he put it: <strong>The</strong> world of human relations does not have the same immutable<br />

laws and ever-recurring sequences characteristic of natural sciences. Rather<br />

they are like a stream, originating from inconspicuous sources, which flows<br />

along various courses to an unknown sea. Social combinations, even when<br />

similar, are never alike'. 8 <strong>The</strong> rules of conduct in a given society are usually<br />

the result of converging ideas of various kinds, every single one of which would<br />

be powerless to produce the effect required on its own. 'Neither the life of a<br />

family nor that of a nation nor that of a state depends entirely or mainly on<br />

the faultless regularity of its logical construction'. 9 In the case of the family,<br />

for example, it is not the contract of marriage that ensures the happiness and<br />

mutual devotion of the married couple. Marriage is a complex experience and<br />

an institution to which many heterogeneous elements contribute. It may be<br />

analyzed with regard to various component factors: sexual attraction, moral<br />

sentiment, care for children, political utility, economic solidarity, traditional<br />

habits, conventional habits, sacramental beliefs. Each of these factors in turn<br />

may be subjected to separate observation and deductions. If we want to study<br />

it as a living whole we are bound to speculate on the binding force or synthesis<br />

which brings and holds together the various elements in the average case or<br />

discloses dangerous centrifugal tendencies. This is a problem for a synthesizing<br />

sociology and a synthesizing jurisprudence.<br />

One of his contemporaries described Vinogradoff as the best known figure<br />

in the learned world of the continent and his description was correct. Take, for<br />

example, his activities in his capacity as university lecturer and popularizer of<br />

the knowledge of history and legal science. From the memoirs of the Russian<br />

academician Bogoslovsky, a pupil of Vinogradoff at Moscow University, may<br />

be quoted a letter describing how the lex Salica was studied: 10<br />

We were given the task of making ourselves acquainted with the text and with the<br />

relevant literature and then commenting on certain articles of the law or presenting<br />

one of the cases dealt with in complete and convincing form. . . . Pavel Gavrilovich<br />

summarized the papers submitted after going through them thoroughly and then<br />

started to interpret the most difficult passages with the students participating. He<br />

7<br />

Custom and Right (Oslo, 1925), 2, 8.<br />

8<br />

Ibid.<br />

9<br />

Ibid., 12.<br />

10<br />

M.M. Bogolovsky, Istoriografiia, Memuaristika, Epistolariia (Moscow, 1987), 76-77.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!