26.03.2013 Views

Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...

Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...

Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Structure of English Common Law in the Seventeenth Century 69<br />

Signification of Words', and announced in the preface to that work a further<br />

tract he was preparing on legal rules (de regulis mm). 40 <strong>The</strong>se three works,<br />

in the order Cowell planned to complete them, would have matched the<br />

three-part introductory textbooks that were popular for students of civil<br />

law: Justinian's Institutes followed by the two last titles of the Digest, de<br />

verborum signification and de diversis regulis iuris antiqui. 41 This glimpse of<br />

Cowell's overall plan raises the further question - for whom did he compose<br />

his Institutiones Juris Anglicanit<br />

Though the preface to the Institutiones, like the dedication of <strong>The</strong> Interpreter,<br />

addressed both civilians and common lawyers, it is now often supposed<br />

that Cowell directed his work primarily to students of civil law at Cambridge<br />

and Oxford, to teach them the laws of their own country. 42 <strong>The</strong>re had been<br />

some very basic instruction on common law in or around the universities since<br />

at least the fifteenth century, and Cambridge officials in 1570 sought to require<br />

that recipients of the D.C.L. study the laws of England. 43 Cowell's work not<br />

only served this need, but gave civilians, already intimately familiar with the<br />

content of Justinian's Institutes, the means to draw ready lessons about the<br />

'universal principles of justice' that underlay English and Roman law. 44<br />

<strong>The</strong> Institutiones surely provided useful knowledge to students of civil law<br />

in a most palatable form, but Cowell (or his publisher) probably had in mind a<br />

readership among students of the common law as well. <strong>The</strong> number of civilians<br />

in England was tiny, twelve or fifteen practising in London at any one time. 45<br />

It is impossible to know how many common lawyers bought the 1605 edition<br />

40<br />

Cowell, Interpreter, preface, sig. *3v. Cowell left the final tract unfinished at his death in 1611.<br />

41<br />

Francis Bacon recommended to James VI and I that three such works be prepared to supplement<br />

a digest of English law, 'A Proposition to His Majesty . . . Touching the Compiling and Amendment<br />

of the Laws of England' in Works of Francis Bacon, xiii, 61, 70.<br />

42<br />

C.P. Rodgers, 'LegalHumanismandEnglishLaw-<strong>The</strong>Contributionof the English Civilians', Irish<br />

Jur., N.S.,xix (1984), 127-28; Stein, 'Continental Influences', 1108; Levack, Civil Lawyers, 137.<br />

43<br />

An Oxford statute of 1432 sought to regularize some (probably extramural) teaching of the<br />

'English mode of pleading', Statuta Antiqua Universitatis Oxoniensis, S. Gibson, ed. (Oxford, 1931),<br />

240-41; H. Rashdall, <strong>The</strong> Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 1936), iii,<br />

162; A. Giuliani, '<strong>The</strong> Influence of Rhetoric on the Law of Evidence and Pleading', L'Educazione<br />

Giuridica (Perugia, 1979), ii, 228; J. Fortescue, De Laudibus Legum Angliae, S.B. Chrimes ed. and<br />

tr. (Cambridge, 1949), 195-96. Dr. Whitgift's reformed set of statutes for Cambridge University,<br />

promulgated in 1570 but successfully resisted by the Puritan faction within the university, had required<br />

that a doctor of laws study the laws of England soon after taking the doctorate, so that he not be ignorant<br />

of the laws of his own country, De legum doctoribus, ch. 14, Cambridge University Transactions during<br />

the Puritan Controversies of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, J. Heywood and T. Wright, ed., i<br />

(1854), 10, ix; Levack, Civil Lawyers, 128. James Whitelocke reported studying the common law from<br />

a civilian's manuscript when he accepted an Oxford fellowship in civil law, M.H. Curtis, Oxford and<br />

Cambridge in Transition, 1558-1642 (Oxford, 1959), 159-60.<br />

44<br />

Stein, 'Continental Influences', 1108; Watson, 'Justinian's Institutes and Some English Counterparts',<br />

183; Levack, Civil Lawyers, 137.<br />

45<br />

Levack, Civil Lawyers, 3, 21-22; Coquillette, 'Legal Ideology and Incorporation', 21, n. 66 and<br />

Civilian Writers, 31 and n. 66. Levack counted about 200 in all the civilian callings between 1603 and<br />

1641 and cited estimates of perhaps 2,000 barristers in the comparable period.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!