Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...
Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...
Appendix CASE ONE - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> Structure of English Common Law in the Seventeenth Century 69<br />
Signification of Words', and announced in the preface to that work a further<br />
tract he was preparing on legal rules (de regulis mm). 40 <strong>The</strong>se three works,<br />
in the order Cowell planned to complete them, would have matched the<br />
three-part introductory textbooks that were popular for students of civil<br />
law: Justinian's Institutes followed by the two last titles of the Digest, de<br />
verborum signification and de diversis regulis iuris antiqui. 41 This glimpse of<br />
Cowell's overall plan raises the further question - for whom did he compose<br />
his Institutiones Juris Anglicanit<br />
Though the preface to the Institutiones, like the dedication of <strong>The</strong> Interpreter,<br />
addressed both civilians and common lawyers, it is now often supposed<br />
that Cowell directed his work primarily to students of civil law at Cambridge<br />
and Oxford, to teach them the laws of their own country. 42 <strong>The</strong>re had been<br />
some very basic instruction on common law in or around the universities since<br />
at least the fifteenth century, and Cambridge officials in 1570 sought to require<br />
that recipients of the D.C.L. study the laws of England. 43 Cowell's work not<br />
only served this need, but gave civilians, already intimately familiar with the<br />
content of Justinian's Institutes, the means to draw ready lessons about the<br />
'universal principles of justice' that underlay English and Roman law. 44<br />
<strong>The</strong> Institutiones surely provided useful knowledge to students of civil law<br />
in a most palatable form, but Cowell (or his publisher) probably had in mind a<br />
readership among students of the common law as well. <strong>The</strong> number of civilians<br />
in England was tiny, twelve or fifteen practising in London at any one time. 45<br />
It is impossible to know how many common lawyers bought the 1605 edition<br />
40<br />
Cowell, Interpreter, preface, sig. *3v. Cowell left the final tract unfinished at his death in 1611.<br />
41<br />
Francis Bacon recommended to James VI and I that three such works be prepared to supplement<br />
a digest of English law, 'A Proposition to His Majesty . . . Touching the Compiling and Amendment<br />
of the Laws of England' in Works of Francis Bacon, xiii, 61, 70.<br />
42<br />
C.P. Rodgers, 'LegalHumanismandEnglishLaw-<strong>The</strong>Contributionof the English Civilians', Irish<br />
Jur., N.S.,xix (1984), 127-28; Stein, 'Continental Influences', 1108; Levack, Civil Lawyers, 137.<br />
43<br />
An Oxford statute of 1432 sought to regularize some (probably extramural) teaching of the<br />
'English mode of pleading', Statuta Antiqua Universitatis Oxoniensis, S. Gibson, ed. (Oxford, 1931),<br />
240-41; H. Rashdall, <strong>The</strong> Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 1936), iii,<br />
162; A. Giuliani, '<strong>The</strong> Influence of Rhetoric on the Law of Evidence and Pleading', L'Educazione<br />
Giuridica (Perugia, 1979), ii, 228; J. Fortescue, De Laudibus Legum Angliae, S.B. Chrimes ed. and<br />
tr. (Cambridge, 1949), 195-96. Dr. Whitgift's reformed set of statutes for Cambridge University,<br />
promulgated in 1570 but successfully resisted by the Puritan faction within the university, had required<br />
that a doctor of laws study the laws of England soon after taking the doctorate, so that he not be ignorant<br />
of the laws of his own country, De legum doctoribus, ch. 14, Cambridge University Transactions during<br />
the Puritan Controversies of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, J. Heywood and T. Wright, ed., i<br />
(1854), 10, ix; Levack, Civil Lawyers, 128. James Whitelocke reported studying the common law from<br />
a civilian's manuscript when he accepted an Oxford fellowship in civil law, M.H. Curtis, Oxford and<br />
Cambridge in Transition, 1558-1642 (Oxford, 1959), 159-60.<br />
44<br />
Stein, 'Continental Influences', 1108; Watson, 'Justinian's Institutes and Some English Counterparts',<br />
183; Levack, Civil Lawyers, 137.<br />
45<br />
Levack, Civil Lawyers, 3, 21-22; Coquillette, 'Legal Ideology and Incorporation', 21, n. 66 and<br />
Civilian Writers, 31 and n. 66. Levack counted about 200 in all the civilian callings between 1603 and<br />
1641 and cited estimates of perhaps 2,000 barristers in the comparable period.