412. Dickerson M, Walker M, Legg Engl<strong>and</strong> S, Hinchy J. Demographic, personality, cognitive <strong>and</strong> behavioral correlates <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-course betting <strong>involvement</strong>. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gambling</strong> Studies 1990;6(2):165-82. 413. Lee H-P, Chae PK, Lee H-S, Kim Y-K. The five-factor gambling <strong>motivation</strong> model. Psychiatry Research 2007;150(1):21-32. 414. Clarke D, Tse S, Abbott MW, Townsend S, Kingi P, Manaia W. Reasons for starting <strong>and</strong> continuing gambling in a mixed ethnic community sample <strong>of</strong> pathological <strong>and</strong> non-problem gamblers. International <strong>Gambling</strong> Studies 2007;7(3):299-313. 415. Binde P. Why people gamble: A comprehensive <strong>motivation</strong>al model. (Manuscript); 2008. 416. Rockl<strong>of</strong>f MJ, Dyer V. The four Es <strong>of</strong> problem gambling: A psychological measure <strong>of</strong> risk. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gambling</strong> Studies 2006;22(1):101-20. 417. Rockl<strong>of</strong>f MJ, Dyer V. The Four Es 1-year later: A tool for predicting the development <strong>of</strong> gambling problems. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gambling</strong> Studies 2007;23(4):467-78. 418. Blaszczynski A, Nower L. A pathway model <strong>of</strong> problem <strong>and</strong> pathological gambling. Addiction 2002;97(5):487-99. 419. Nower L, Blaszczynski A. Impulsivity <strong>and</strong> pathological gambling: A descriptive model. International <strong>Gambling</strong> Studies 2006;6(1):61-75. 420. Sharpe L, Tarrier N. Towards a cognitive-behavioural theory <strong>of</strong> problem gambling. British Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry 1993;162:407-12. 421. Sharpe L. A reformulated cognitive-behavioral model <strong>of</strong> problem gambling: A biopsychoscial perspective. Clinical Psychology Review 2002;22(1):1-25. 423. Cummings WT, Corney W. A conceptual model <strong>of</strong> gambling behavior: Fishbein’s Theory <strong>of</strong> Reasoned Action. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gambling</strong> Behavior 1987;3(3):190-201. 424. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, <strong>and</strong> behavior: An introduction to theory <strong>and</strong> research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975. 425. Ariyabuddhiphongs V. A test <strong>of</strong> the <strong>social</strong> cognitive model <strong>of</strong> lottery gambling in Thail<strong>and</strong>. International <strong>Gambling</strong> Studies 2006;6(1):77-93. 426. Ariyabuddhiphongs V, Chanchalermporn N. A test <strong>of</strong> <strong>social</strong> cognitive theory reciprocal <strong>and</strong> sequential effects: Hope, superstitious belief <strong>and</strong> environmental factors among lottery gamblers in Thail<strong>and</strong>. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gambling</strong> Studies 2007;23(2):201-14. 427. Zangeneh M, Haydon E. Psycho-structural cybernetic model, feedback <strong>and</strong> problem gambling: A new theoretical approach. eCOMMUNITY: International Journal <strong>of</strong> Mental Health & Addiction 2004;1(2). 428. Abt V, McGurrin MC, Smith JF. Toward a synoptic model <strong>of</strong> gambling behavior. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gambling</strong> Behavior 1985;1(2):79-88. 429. Gambino B. Clarifying the at-risk label: A commentary. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gambling</strong> Issues 2006;16. 430. OPGRC. Problem <strong>Gambling</strong> Framework. April 30, 2008: Ontario Problem <strong>Gambling</strong> Research Centre; 2008. Retrieved August 2008 from http://www.gamblingresearch. org/printdoc.sz?cid=2007 431. Lesieur HR, Blume SB. The South Oaks <strong>Gambling</strong> Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification <strong>of</strong> pathological gamblers. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry 1987;144(9):1184-8. 432. Abbott MW, Clarke D. Prospective problem gambling research: Contribution <strong>and</strong> potential. International <strong>Gambling</strong> Studies 2007;7(1):123-44. G A M B L I N G M O T I VAT I O N A N D I N V O LV E M E N T 89
433. LaPlante DA, Nelson SE, LaBrie RA, Shaffer HJ. Stability <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>of</strong> disordered gambling: Lessons from longitudinal studies. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry 2008;53(1):52-60. 434. Korn DA, Shaffer HJ. <strong>Gambling</strong> <strong>and</strong> the health <strong>of</strong> the public: Adopting a public health perspective. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gambling</strong> Studies 1999;15(4):289-365. 90 G A M B L I N G M O T I VAT I O N A N D I N V O LV E M E N T
- Page 1 and 2:
Gambling motivation and involvement
- Page 3 and 4:
Report no 2 in the SWELOGS-programm
- Page 5 and 6:
Historical studies and literature h
- Page 7 and 8:
Extensive summary thiS REpORt pRESE
- Page 9 and 10:
Introduction Objective This report
- Page 11 and 12:
All predominantly biological, psych
- Page 13 and 14:
Sociological approaches SOciOLOGy S
- Page 15 and 16:
valve function [63, 64]. According
- Page 17 and 18:
RELEvancE tO pRObLEm GambLinG Studi
- Page 19 and 20:
The social rewards of gambling may
- Page 21 and 22:
elieving themselves to be, or aspir
- Page 23 and 24:
ling venues. Australian data sugges
- Page 25 and 26:
RELEvancE tO pRObLEm GambLinG Studi
- Page 27 and 28:
utility for a person who owns only
- Page 29 and 30:
105, 60, 141-145]. The Friedman and
- Page 31 and 32:
RELEvancE tO pRObLEm GambLinG Studi
- Page 33 and 34:
price of heroin would probably mean
- Page 35 and 36:
RELEvancE tO pRObLEm GambLinG Studi
- Page 37 and 38:
in order to maximize utility from s
- Page 39 and 40: e discussed below, where commercial
- Page 41 and 42: Gambling and the macro-economy Ther
- Page 43 and 44: however, that individuals within th
- Page 45 and 46: Cultural approaches in 1952, tWO am
- Page 47 and 48: In an appendix to Man, Play, and Ga
- Page 49 and 50: However, several scholars have main
- Page 51 and 52: covering 58 of the 60 distinct cult
- Page 53 and 54: theory. In these studies, the objec
- Page 55 and 56: is epidemiological and psychologica
- Page 57 and 58: RELEvancE tO pRObLEm GambLinG Studi
- Page 59 and 60: Comprehensive models of gambling be
- Page 61 and 62: Involvement models Involvement mode
- Page 63 and 64: than believing that their problems
- Page 65 and 66: Concluding discussion Gambling - a
- Page 67 and 68: solidarity. It is first when borrow
- Page 69 and 70: Much contemporary research into gam
- Page 71 and 72: References 1. Rönnberg S, Volberg
- Page 73 and 74: 39. Grinols EL. Gambling in America
- Page 75 and 76: 84. Goffman E. Frame Analysis. Harm
- Page 77 and 78: 128. Volberg RA, Nysse-Carris KL, G
- Page 79 and 80: 173. Becker GS, Grossman M, Murphy
- Page 81 and 82: 218. Cain M, Law D, Peel D. The rel
- Page 83 and 84: 265. Knapp BL. Gambling, Game, and
- Page 85 and 86: 311. Desmond GR. Gambling among the
- Page 87 and 88: 349. O’Brien Cousins S, Witcher C
- Page 89: 391. Kingma S. A sign of the times:
Change language