27.03.2013 Views

Replies to Questions from Finance Committee Members

Replies to Questions from Finance Committee Members

Replies to Questions from Finance Committee Members

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Examination of Estimates of Expenditure 2003-04 Reply Serial No.<br />

CONTROLLING OFFICER’S REPLY TO<br />

INITIAL WRITTEN QUESTION<br />

ETWB(E)043<br />

Question Serial No.<br />

Head : 44 Environmental Protection Department Subhead(No. & title): 0019<br />

Programme : (1) Waste Facilities<br />

Controlling Officer : Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Environmental Protection<br />

Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Bureau : Secretary for the Environment, Transport and Works<br />

Question :Would the Government inform this Council:<br />

The breakdown by types of chemical waste treated and <strong>to</strong> be treated by the Chemical Waste Treatment Centre in<br />

Tsing Yi in the past two years and in the coming year respectively? How much do they account for the annual<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal handling capacity of the whole Centre? What is the amount of subsidies provided by the Government for<br />

each type of wastes treated (please give the breakdown)? In which part of the Estimates is the expenditure on<br />

these subsidies shown?<br />

Asked by : Hon. CHOY So-yuk<br />

Reply : The breakdown of waste intake by category at the Chemical Waste Treatment Centre in the past two years and<br />

the projection for the coming year is as follows:<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003 (estimate)<br />

Waste Type<br />

(<strong>to</strong>nnes)<br />

(<strong>to</strong>nnes)<br />

(<strong>to</strong>nnes)<br />

Spent etchants (Ammoniacal) 1 750 1 650 1 560<br />

Spent etchants (Non-Ammoniacal) 7 450 7 700 7 650<br />

Acids 2 900 2 650 2 900<br />

Alkalis 1 700 1 500 1 350<br />

Toxic metal solutions 1 500 1 250 1 300<br />

Solvents 3 300 2 700 2 900<br />

Land based waste oil 6 700 7 150 6 800<br />

MARPOL waste 37 300 27 500 30 140<br />

Others 400 350 400<br />

Total 63 000 52 450 55 000<br />

As the design capacity of the Chemical Waste Treatment Centre is 100,000 <strong>to</strong>nnes per year, the chemical waste<br />

intake for the past 2 years accounted for 63% and 52.5% of the design capacity respectively, while the intake for<br />

2003 is expected <strong>to</strong> be 55%.<br />

It is not possible <strong>to</strong> give a breakdown of the subsidies for treating different types of chemical waste because the<br />

costs and subsidies vary depending on the chemical composition and treatment system used and these variables<br />

can change with each consignment of waste. In 2002-03, the overall subsidy <strong>to</strong> chemical waste producers for<br />

treating chemical waste at the Chemical Waste Treatment Centre was about $132 million, which is not shown in<br />

the Estimates of Expenditure 2003-04.<br />

Go<strong>to</strong><strong>to</strong>p<br />

Signature<br />

Name in block letters ROBERT J. S. LAW<br />

Post Title Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Environmental Protection<br />

Date 20 March 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!