27.03.2013 Views

Replies to Questions from Finance Committee Members

Replies to Questions from Finance Committee Members

Replies to Questions from Finance Committee Members

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Examination of Estimates of Expenditure 2003-04 Reply Serial No.<br />

CONTROLLING OFFICER’S REPLY TO<br />

INITIAL WRITTEN QUESTION<br />

ETWB(E)051<br />

Question Serial<br />

No.<br />

Head : 44 Environmental Protection Department Subhead(No. & title): 0374<br />

Programme : (2) Air<br />

Controlling Officer : Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Environmental Protection<br />

Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Bureau : Secretary for the Environment, Transport and Works<br />

Question : Provision for 2003-04 is HK$233.4 million (63.6%) higher than the revised estimate for<br />

2002-03 which is mainly due <strong>to</strong> increased requirement for one-off grants <strong>to</strong> assist owners<br />

of pre-Euro diesel heavy vehicles <strong>to</strong> retrofit their vehicles with particulate removal devices<br />

and <strong>to</strong> encourage diesel public light bus owners <strong>to</strong> replace their vehicles early with ones<br />

that run on LPG or electricity. But, there is still a large amount of balance for these 2<br />

items under the subhead 700-568 and 700-570 of the capital account. What is the reason<br />

for the dramatic increase of resource?<br />

Asked by : Hon. YOUNG, Howard<br />

Reply : Both subhead 700-568 (i.e. the particulate removal device installation programme) and<br />

700-570 (i.e. the liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) or electric light bus programme) are new<br />

programmes started in 2002-03. They are still at their early implementation stages with a<br />

very small number of the eligible vehicles having received the one-off grants. The<br />

expenditures of the two programmes in 2002-03 are thus small and a large balance remains at<br />

the end of the fiscal year.<br />

Go<strong>to</strong><strong>to</strong>p<br />

The increase of the provision of $233.4 million in 2003-04 over the revised estimate for<br />

2002-03 is mainly due <strong>to</strong> an additional expenditure of $314.5 million expected for the above<br />

two capital account items in 2003-04 (as analysed in the following paragraphs), partly offset<br />

by the reduced requirement of $84.2 million for the one-off grant for the LPG taxi programme<br />

under subhead 700-554. The requirement for the LPG taxi grant in 2003-04 is expected <strong>to</strong><br />

be smaller because most of the diesel taxis have already been replaced by LPG taxis. There<br />

are thus fewer recipients for the grant in 2003-04.<br />

For subhead 700-568, we expect that about 29,000 additional eligible vehicles will receive the<br />

grant for the installation in 2003-04 as compared <strong>to</strong> 2002-03. Thus, the provision for the<br />

one-off grant payment will have <strong>to</strong> be increased by $261.2 million over the revised estimated<br />

expenditure for 2002-03.<br />

For subhead 700-570, about 900 additional diesel light buses are expected <strong>to</strong> be replaced<br />

under the programme in 2003-04 as compared <strong>to</strong> 2002-03. The provision for the payment of<br />

the grant has thus <strong>to</strong> be increased by $53.3 million over the one for 2002-03.<br />

Signature<br />

Name in block letters ROBERT J. S. LAW<br />

Post Title Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Environmental Protection<br />

Date 20 March 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!