27.03.2013 Views

Cattle 1853 - Lewis Family Farm

Cattle 1853 - Lewis Family Farm

Cattle 1853 - Lewis Family Farm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

418 CATTLE:<br />

from the healthy article. A very minute quantity of either will<br />

suffice to develope the disease in man. The cream, ordinarily sufficient<br />

to be added to the coffee drank at a single meal, is said to have<br />

induced an attack. The butter or cheese eaten at one repast has frequently<br />

been known to prove effective. The property is not con-<br />

tained in any of the elements of the milk exclusively, but distributed"<br />

throughout the whole of them, being possessed by the butter-milk as<br />

well as the whey. Beef, in the quantity of a few ounces, will produce<br />

the disease, and it is believed in a more violent and fatal form than<br />

when it is produced by milk or any of its preparations.<br />

The effect of the poison is manifested throughout the entire<br />

system, and vitiates all the secretions. An experiment, which went<br />

far to prove how deeply the milk of other animals is imbued with -its<br />

poison, was made by administering the infected meat to a bitch suckling<br />

five puppies. The effect produced in them was very sudden,<br />

and the entire litter died in four days, which was two days before the<br />

occurrence of the death of the mother.<br />

The subtle, poisonous principle, of whatever it may be proved to<br />

consist, seems to possess the power of infinite reproduction, by some<br />

vital or chemico-vital action of the system of those animals poisoned<br />

by its influence. Thus, supposing one pound of flesh to prove suffi-<br />

cient to produce the death of another animal, it will be found that<br />

each pound of flesh of that animal so destroyed, will possess as active<br />

powers of destruction, and will, in its turn, serve to contaminate the<br />

whole body of another animal in the same degree.<br />

Dr. J. B. Johnston, of Indiana, says : " I never knew the disease to<br />

prevail where there was not a free growth of weeds. I well know<br />

that it is circumscribed, that a small section will produce the disease,<br />

then an exemption for some distance, when it will again recur. So<br />

of some farms ; a portion will produce it, and the other will not. In<br />

fact, there is not a county from Floyd to the mouth of the Wabash,<br />

and as far north as White River, that is exempt from milk sickness<br />

and it often occurs in both Southern Illinois and Kentucky. I have<br />

never heard of it above the- 4 1st degree of north latitude, and it<br />

seldom reaches that line. My firm convictions are, that the disease<br />

termed milk sickness is produced by the rhus toxicodendron, or poison<br />

oak, and that it is a separate and distinct species from the radicans,<br />

or poison vine. It is further stated that the poison oak never vines—<br />

that it is never seen to take hold on trees, and that it grows from one<br />

to three feet in height ; that it has three, while the radicans or poison<br />

vine has five leaves."<br />

Dr. Mcllhenny, of Ohio, who has paid much attention to this dis-<br />

" On the cause of milk sickness, we must be allowed to<br />

ease, says :<br />

express our decided conviction, that it is produced by the rhus toxicodendron,<br />

or poison oak, for the following reasons :<br />

1. Milk sickness does not prevail where there is no rhus—that in<br />

—<br />

;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!