Psychology & Buddhism.pdf
Psychology & Buddhism.pdf
Psychology & Buddhism.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Gestalt <strong>Psychology</strong> and Mahayana <strong>Buddhism</strong> 99<br />
extension of its principles to individuals and groups previously outside its social<br />
vision. To stand still is to regress. It requires an ongoing process of confronting<br />
inconsistencies and hypocrisies, and righting them (e.g., ending slavery, woman’s<br />
suffrage, civil rights). These breeches represent blatant instances of absolutization,<br />
where false attribution of absolute difference (black vs. white, man vs.<br />
woman, gay vs. straight, Protestant vs. Catholic vs. Jew vs. Muslim, tall vs. short,<br />
smart vs. slow) ignites prejudice and denigration. Moral development of individuals<br />
and cultures requires that relational understanding supplant such misattributions<br />
of absoluteness. It often appears to be up to individuals and smaller<br />
groups to awaken the latent understanding and conscience of the larger culture, to<br />
confront the leaden force of cultural inertia and moral complacency with the<br />
deeper truth of undivided being.<br />
Author’s Note<br />
This chapter is an expanded version of a paper originally presented at the 106th Annual Convention of<br />
the American Psychological Association, Aug. 15,1998, in San Francisco, CA. I wish to thank Jeffrey<br />
Hopkins, Georges Dreyfus, and Robert Thurman for their immensely helpful comments on the sections<br />
on <strong>Buddhism</strong>. Timothy O’Brian, Ralph Ellis, Julie Barnes, Jeannie Russell, and Gabrielle Kelly have<br />
also earned my enduring appreciation for their wise counsel and unflagging support. Above all, I thank<br />
Mary Henle for awakening me to what psychology is and can be. Whatever merit this paper has is due<br />
largely to the contributions of these and other individuals. Where it falls short, responsibility is, of<br />
course, mine alone. Whatever merit that might not belong to others, I dedicate to all sentient beings.<br />
References<br />
Asch, S. (1952). Social psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.<br />
Brandt, R. B. (Ed.) (1961). Value and obligation. Harcourt, Brace, & World.<br />
Brandt, R. B. (1967). Ethical relativism. In P. Edwards (Ed,-in-chief), Encyclopedia of philosophy<br />
(Vol. 3, pp. 75–78). New York: Macmillan and The Free Press.<br />
Conze, E. (Trans.) (1973). The perfection of wisdom in eight thousand lines & its verse summary.<br />
Bolinas, CA: Four Seasons Foundation.<br />
Dalai Lama XIV. (1993). The meaning of life from a Buddhist perspective. J. Hopkins (Ed. & Trans.),<br />
Boston: Wisdom Publications.<br />
The Diamond Sutra & The Sutra of Hui-Neng. (1990). A. F. Price & W. Mou-lam (Trans.). Boston:<br />
Shambala.<br />
Dreyfus, G. B. J. (1997). Recognizing reality: Dharmakirti’s philosophy and its Tibetan interpretations.<br />
Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.<br />
Duncker, K. (1939). Ethical relativity? (An enquiry into the psychology of ethics). Mind, 48, 39–57.<br />
Ellis, R. D. (1992). Moral pluralism reconsidered: Is there an intrinsic-extrinsic value distinction?<br />
Philosophical Papers, 21(1), 45–64.<br />
Frankena, W. K. (1973). Ethics (Rev. ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Princeton-Hall.<br />
Freud, S. (1955). Some neurotic mechanisms in jealousy, paranoia and homosexuality. In J. Strachey<br />
(Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud<br />
(Vol. 18, pp. 223–232). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1922.)