04.04.2013 Views

Psychology & Buddhism.pdf

Psychology & Buddhism.pdf

Psychology & Buddhism.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

200 Leonard A. Jason and John Moritsugu<br />

been to develop and propose theories of how people become effective and adaptive<br />

in varied social environments. The ecological paradigm is a guiding framework<br />

for understanding behavior in interaction with its social and cultural contexts.<br />

In this way, it is a more theoretically rich and useful model than the ones reviewed<br />

above. Kingry-Westergaard and Kelly (1990) have suggested that a principle fundamental<br />

to ecological approaches is the need to use multiple methods to understand<br />

the complex qualities of relationships and systems. One of these methods for<br />

increasing our understanding of that which we claim to know is the collaborative<br />

relationship between the researcher and the participants. This means that concepts<br />

and hypotheses are developed and tested by both the researcher and the participants.<br />

This is a principle that would be welcomed by Buddhists, as it characterizes their<br />

values as well. This feature of the ecological model has also been espoused by many<br />

feminists, among others, who recommend that we listen to and understand people<br />

first and foremost from their points of view. When people are involved in research<br />

projects, they should be included as participants, not as subjects, and the process of<br />

being understood and represented is considered empowering.<br />

Ecological principles could be used by professionals who join in long-term<br />

collaborative relationships with persons and settings. By involving participants<br />

actively in the planning of interventions, the recipients of the programs receive<br />

support, learn to identify resources, and become better problem-solvers who are<br />

more likely to manage future problems and issues. Interventions that have been<br />

generated from collaboratively defined, produced, and implemented change<br />

efforts are more apt to endure. By involving participants in the design of the<br />

research, investigators may gain a greater appreciation of the culture and unique<br />

needs of the community, and this may increase the possibility of the research<br />

findings being used to benefit the community. An ecological approach would analyze<br />

community traditions for responding to community problems, help evaluate<br />

or create settings that provide individuals opportunities to continue receiving support<br />

after termination of formal treatment programs, work closely with community<br />

leaders in all aspects of the health care intervention, and assess positive and<br />

negative second-order ripple effects of an intervention. An ecological perspective<br />

provides a method of conceptualizing our problems with anchor points for deeper<br />

analysis that may ultimately help us develop more appropriate health care service<br />

delivery systems.<br />

Contextualism is a primary feature of this Ecological model, and it has been<br />

defined by Kingry-Westergaard and Kelly (1990) as our embeddedness in the<br />

world we observe. Because of this principle, knowledge is relevant only within<br />

a given frame of reference. This idea was further developed by Bry, Hirsch,<br />

Newbrough, Reischl, and Swindle (1990), who viewed knowledge as limited by<br />

its historical and cultural context. They believe that we do not simply glean<br />

knowledge from our objective observations of an objective world, but that the<br />

nature of the knower contributes to the nature of what is known, implying that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!