Psychology & Buddhism.pdf
Psychology & Buddhism.pdf
Psychology & Buddhism.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
108<br />
there were large aspects of human behavior, thought, rationalization and other<br />
cognitive processes that were completely separate from instinct and drives.<br />
Comparatively, they developed out of the individual’s biological maturation<br />
rather than any psychologically based function. In addition, Freud’s drive theory<br />
did not address another instinctual behavior supported by the scientific observations<br />
of Bowlby (1969), and researched by Harlow (1958) and others for primary<br />
attachment to a mothering object. These theorists recognized attachment and<br />
interpersonal relationships as an essential aspect of human development. These<br />
scientific findings form, in part, the basis for Object Relations theory put forth by<br />
Fairburn (1952). Of course, <strong>Buddhism</strong> does not reject attachment in and of itself,<br />
but rather the craving after attachments, which ultimately result in unnecessary<br />
suffering.<br />
Concepts of the “Self” in <strong>Buddhism</strong> and<br />
Psychoanalytic Thinking<br />
G. Rita Dudley-Grant<br />
Other challenges to Freud’s strict id-ego model have also been explicated by<br />
Eagle (1984). “The core of these challenges is that certain critical issues and features<br />
of personality development and of psychopathology, having to do with<br />
object relations theory and self do not easily fit the basic id-ego model of traditional<br />
theory. [The most meaningful] descriptions of psychological development<br />
to many recent clinicians and theorists are ... accounts that focus on such dimensions<br />
as self-other differentiation, the move from symbiosis to separationindividuation,<br />
and degree of self-cohesiveness” (p. 18).<br />
Similarly, the issue of the ego or “self” has been a central theme in <strong>Buddhism</strong><br />
since its earliest inception. The initial conceptions, Hinayana teachings, reflected<br />
on the ego’s attachment to illusion as a major source of all suffering. Nirvana was<br />
the goal to be attained, which represented the final nihilation of all “selfhood” and<br />
attachments, the causes of suffering. Later Mahayana <strong>Buddhism</strong> suggested that<br />
even Nirvana was not the ultimate goal. Rather the highest achievement was to<br />
transcend suffering in one’s present condition as opposed to escaping it. The<br />
Nichiren sect of Mahayana <strong>Buddhism</strong> further explicates that rather than attempting<br />
to escape suffering, it is the challenging of one’s earthly life, both positive and<br />
negative, that ultimately leads one to enlightened living (The Gosho Translation<br />
Committee, 1979).<br />
Kohut (1971), a major leader in the development of the self-psychology<br />
model, proposed a theory based on the development of “healthy narcissism”. In<br />
this psychoanalytic formulation, others are necessary as aids in development, but<br />
the ultimate goal is autonomous and independent functioning where one can be<br />
most productive and creative. This formulation is perhaps furthest away from