04.04.2013 Views

Psychology & Buddhism.pdf

Psychology & Buddhism.pdf

Psychology & Buddhism.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

108<br />

there were large aspects of human behavior, thought, rationalization and other<br />

cognitive processes that were completely separate from instinct and drives.<br />

Comparatively, they developed out of the individual’s biological maturation<br />

rather than any psychologically based function. In addition, Freud’s drive theory<br />

did not address another instinctual behavior supported by the scientific observations<br />

of Bowlby (1969), and researched by Harlow (1958) and others for primary<br />

attachment to a mothering object. These theorists recognized attachment and<br />

interpersonal relationships as an essential aspect of human development. These<br />

scientific findings form, in part, the basis for Object Relations theory put forth by<br />

Fairburn (1952). Of course, <strong>Buddhism</strong> does not reject attachment in and of itself,<br />

but rather the craving after attachments, which ultimately result in unnecessary<br />

suffering.<br />

Concepts of the “Self” in <strong>Buddhism</strong> and<br />

Psychoanalytic Thinking<br />

G. Rita Dudley-Grant<br />

Other challenges to Freud’s strict id-ego model have also been explicated by<br />

Eagle (1984). “The core of these challenges is that certain critical issues and features<br />

of personality development and of psychopathology, having to do with<br />

object relations theory and self do not easily fit the basic id-ego model of traditional<br />

theory. [The most meaningful] descriptions of psychological development<br />

to many recent clinicians and theorists are ... accounts that focus on such dimensions<br />

as self-other differentiation, the move from symbiosis to separationindividuation,<br />

and degree of self-cohesiveness” (p. 18).<br />

Similarly, the issue of the ego or “self” has been a central theme in <strong>Buddhism</strong><br />

since its earliest inception. The initial conceptions, Hinayana teachings, reflected<br />

on the ego’s attachment to illusion as a major source of all suffering. Nirvana was<br />

the goal to be attained, which represented the final nihilation of all “selfhood” and<br />

attachments, the causes of suffering. Later Mahayana <strong>Buddhism</strong> suggested that<br />

even Nirvana was not the ultimate goal. Rather the highest achievement was to<br />

transcend suffering in one’s present condition as opposed to escaping it. The<br />

Nichiren sect of Mahayana <strong>Buddhism</strong> further explicates that rather than attempting<br />

to escape suffering, it is the challenging of one’s earthly life, both positive and<br />

negative, that ultimately leads one to enlightened living (The Gosho Translation<br />

Committee, 1979).<br />

Kohut (1971), a major leader in the development of the self-psychology<br />

model, proposed a theory based on the development of “healthy narcissism”. In<br />

this psychoanalytic formulation, others are necessary as aids in development, but<br />

the ultimate goal is autonomous and independent functioning where one can be<br />

most productive and creative. This formulation is perhaps furthest away from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!