09.04.2013 Views

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Refuge Resources<br />

(EDL) in the tissue of mussels placed in Anaheim Bay for the purposes of the study (California<br />

Water Boards 2007). The Mussel Watch data for Huntington Harbour showed levels of lead,<br />

chromium, aldrin, chlordane, DDE, DDT, endrin, <strong>and</strong> heptachlor above EDL. These data,<br />

although an indication of the present of toxics, do not provide adequate information to determine if<br />

beneficial uses within the water bodies are being impacted. As a result, a thorough toxicity study<br />

of Anaheim Bay <strong>and</strong> Huntington Harbour was initiated in 2001.<br />

In 2007, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board released the results of the Anaheim<br />

Bay <strong>and</strong> Huntington Harbour Sediment <strong>and</strong> Water Column Toxicity Study (California Water<br />

Boards 2007), initiated in 2001. The goal of the study was to attain a comprehensive <strong>and</strong> current<br />

assessment of the ambient water <strong>and</strong> sediment quality in the Anaheim Bay/Huntington Harbour<br />

Complex <strong>and</strong> to establish baseline conditions for the area. The monitoring design involved a<br />

stratified-r<strong>and</strong>om sampling design with a spatially systematic component that prevented the<br />

clustering of sampling sites in an effort to achieve an unbiased representation of water quality<br />

throughout the study area. The monitoring study consisted of sampling 60 sites, 30 each in<br />

Anaheim Bay <strong>and</strong> Huntington Harbour. None of the sampling locations occurred within the<br />

Refuge boundary; however, one sampling location (#26) was situated just to the east of the Pacific<br />

Coast Highway bridge <strong>and</strong> two additional sampling sites (#3 <strong>and</strong> #29) were located to the just to<br />

the southeast of the large, central tidal channel that extends up into the Refuge (refer to Figure 4-<br />

1). The remaining sampling locations in Anaheim Bay were located to the west of Pacific Coast<br />

Highway in Anaheim Bay proper. Sampling was conducted to measure sediment chemistry,<br />

surface water chemistry, <strong>and</strong> benthic infauna. At each sample location, field measurements of the<br />

water column were taken to measure pH, dissolved oxygen, temperature, salinity, bottom depth,<br />

turbidity, <strong>and</strong> total suspended solids. The results of the field measurements of the water column<br />

for the three sampling sites located closest to the Refuge are provided in Table 4-3.<br />

The toxicity study noted seasonal differences in the concentrations of various metals <strong>and</strong> organics<br />

in sediments collected in Anaheim Bay. These differences occurred between wet <strong>and</strong> dry months;<br />

however, a particular season was not consistently higher than the other. For example, wet season<br />

samples had significantly higher concentrations of mercury than the dry season samples. Silver<br />

concentrations on the other h<strong>and</strong> were higher in the dry season samples than in the wet season<br />

samples. Total DDT <strong>and</strong> PCB concentrations were higher in the dry season than in the wet season<br />

(California Water Boards 2007). In total for sampling sites near the Refuge, contaminants likely<br />

to be associated with toxicity were present in sediments at sampling location #3, but at low<br />

concentrations. The overall conclusions of the study were that Anaheim Bay supports a diverse<br />

infaunal community that does not appear to be impaired. “The sediment geochemistry <strong>and</strong><br />

sediment toxicity analysis indicate a low probability of adverse effects” (California Water Boards<br />

2007). Some seasonal effects were observed, particularly during the wet season when some<br />

sediment toxicity was observed. This wet season toxicity is likely related to increased runoff from<br />

watershed sources during the rainy season.<br />

The Clean Water Act Section 303(d) Impaired Water Bodies list is updated about every two years.<br />

In the latest update prepared in 2006 <strong>and</strong> approved by the USEPA on June 28, 2007, Anaheim Bay<br />

was once again classified as an impaired water body on the 303(d) list. Identified pollutants or<br />

stressors include dieldrin, nickel, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), <strong>and</strong> sediment toxicity. The<br />

proposed date for developing a TMDL for this water body is 2019. The adjacent Huntington<br />

Harbour is also listed in the 2006 303(d) list. The identified pollutants in this water body include<br />

chlordane, copper, lead, nickel, pathogens from urban runoff, PCBs, <strong>and</strong> sediment toxicity.<br />

In accordance with California Water Code Section 13393, the California State Water Resources<br />

Control Board (SWRCB) has developed sediment quality objectives for toxic pollutants for<br />

Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/Environmental Assessment 4-25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!