Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 5 <br />
liquefaction, settlement, ground rupture, or lateral spreading. Therefore, no adverse effects<br />
related to geology or soils are anticipated under this alternative.<br />
Public Use<br />
Existing soil <strong>and</strong> geological conditions on the site do not pose a hazard, nor do these conditions<br />
adversely affect the function of the pathway that provides access for the public from the Refuge<br />
office/visitor contact station to the observation deck or the observation deck itself. Therefore, the<br />
facilities used in association with the existing public use program would not be impacted as a result<br />
of the geological or soil conditions on the Refuge.<br />
5.2.1.3 Effects on Mineral Resources<br />
Continuing current management practices <strong>and</strong> public use programs on the Refuge would have no<br />
effect on the ongoing oil extraction operation at Oil Isl<strong>and</strong>.<br />
5.2.1.4 Effects to Agricultural Resources<br />
<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />
L<strong>and</strong>s identified as Prime Farml<strong>and</strong> occur immediately adjacent to the Refuge <strong>and</strong> these l<strong>and</strong>s are<br />
currently being farmed under the authority of the U.S. Navy. The continuation of wildlife <strong>and</strong><br />
habitat management activities <strong>and</strong> public use programs currently occurring on the Refuge would<br />
have no effect on these ongoing farming operations. No effects to adjacent agricultural resources<br />
are therefore anticipated under Alternative A.<br />
5.2.1.5 Effects to Hydrology<br />
<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />
The primary management activities occurring on the Refuge that could have an effect on the<br />
hydrology in <strong>and</strong> around the Refuge involves the repair <strong>and</strong> replacement of existing culverts that<br />
facilitate tidal flows in <strong>and</strong> out of the restored wetl<strong>and</strong> areas on the Refuge. These repairs are<br />
intended to maintain, <strong>and</strong> in some cases restore, tidal circulation between the main marsh complex<br />
<strong>and</strong> the restored subtidal areas of Forrestal, Case Road, 7 th Street, <strong>and</strong> Perimeter Ponds, as well<br />
as improve tidal circulation within the marsh to levels that existed prior to culvert deterioration.<br />
The activities would not result in any significant adverse changes to the hydrological conditions<br />
within the Refuge. As described in Chapter 4, erosion resulting from tidal action <strong>and</strong> wind waves,<br />
along with other factors, is occurring along the banks of Forrestal Pond, Case Road Pond, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
mitigation channel to the west of the Bolsa Cell. No actions are proposed under Alternative A to<br />
address this issue; therefore, erosion of the banks would be expected to continue under this<br />
alternative.<br />
Public Use<br />
The existing public use program does not involve any activities that would impact hydrology within<br />
or outside of the Refuge; therefore, there would be no effect to hydrology from the continuation of<br />
the existing public use program on the Refuge.<br />
5.2.1.6 Effects to Water Quality<br />
<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />
BMPs are currently implemented by Refuge staff as necessary during culvert maintenance<br />
activities to minimize erosion <strong>and</strong> sedimentation into adjacent wetl<strong>and</strong>s. These BMPs (e.g., fiber<br />
rolls, silt fencing, cofferdams) are implemented during repairs to culverts, as well as other<br />
maintenance activities occurring in areas upstream or adjacent to the marsh. The continued<br />
implementation of these types of measures would minimize or avoid water quality impacts to the<br />
coastal wetl<strong>and</strong>s on the Refuge, as well as the adjacent Anaheim Bay. Monitoring <strong>and</strong> cleanup of<br />
5-4 Seal Beach National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge