09.04.2013 Views

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5 <br />

liquefaction, settlement, ground rupture, or lateral spreading. Therefore, no adverse effects<br />

related to geology or soils are anticipated under this alternative.<br />

Public Use<br />

Existing soil <strong>and</strong> geological conditions on the site do not pose a hazard, nor do these conditions<br />

adversely affect the function of the pathway that provides access for the public from the Refuge<br />

office/visitor contact station to the observation deck or the observation deck itself. Therefore, the<br />

facilities used in association with the existing public use program would not be impacted as a result<br />

of the geological or soil conditions on the Refuge.<br />

5.2.1.3 Effects on Mineral Resources<br />

Continuing current management practices <strong>and</strong> public use programs on the Refuge would have no<br />

effect on the ongoing oil extraction operation at Oil Isl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

5.2.1.4 Effects to Agricultural Resources<br />

<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />

L<strong>and</strong>s identified as Prime Farml<strong>and</strong> occur immediately adjacent to the Refuge <strong>and</strong> these l<strong>and</strong>s are<br />

currently being farmed under the authority of the U.S. Navy. The continuation of wildlife <strong>and</strong><br />

habitat management activities <strong>and</strong> public use programs currently occurring on the Refuge would<br />

have no effect on these ongoing farming operations. No effects to adjacent agricultural resources<br />

are therefore anticipated under Alternative A.<br />

5.2.1.5 Effects to Hydrology<br />

<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />

The primary management activities occurring on the Refuge that could have an effect on the<br />

hydrology in <strong>and</strong> around the Refuge involves the repair <strong>and</strong> replacement of existing culverts that<br />

facilitate tidal flows in <strong>and</strong> out of the restored wetl<strong>and</strong> areas on the Refuge. These repairs are<br />

intended to maintain, <strong>and</strong> in some cases restore, tidal circulation between the main marsh complex<br />

<strong>and</strong> the restored subtidal areas of Forrestal, Case Road, 7 th Street, <strong>and</strong> Perimeter Ponds, as well<br />

as improve tidal circulation within the marsh to levels that existed prior to culvert deterioration.<br />

The activities would not result in any significant adverse changes to the hydrological conditions<br />

within the Refuge. As described in Chapter 4, erosion resulting from tidal action <strong>and</strong> wind waves,<br />

along with other factors, is occurring along the banks of Forrestal Pond, Case Road Pond, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

mitigation channel to the west of the Bolsa Cell. No actions are proposed under Alternative A to<br />

address this issue; therefore, erosion of the banks would be expected to continue under this<br />

alternative.<br />

Public Use<br />

The existing public use program does not involve any activities that would impact hydrology within<br />

or outside of the Refuge; therefore, there would be no effect to hydrology from the continuation of<br />

the existing public use program on the Refuge.<br />

5.2.1.6 Effects to Water Quality<br />

<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />

BMPs are currently implemented by Refuge staff as necessary during culvert maintenance<br />

activities to minimize erosion <strong>and</strong> sedimentation into adjacent wetl<strong>and</strong>s. These BMPs (e.g., fiber<br />

rolls, silt fencing, cofferdams) are implemented during repairs to culverts, as well as other<br />

maintenance activities occurring in areas upstream or adjacent to the marsh. The continued<br />

implementation of these types of measures would minimize or avoid water quality impacts to the<br />

coastal wetl<strong>and</strong>s on the Refuge, as well as the adjacent Anaheim Bay. Monitoring <strong>and</strong> cleanup of<br />

5-4 Seal Beach National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!