Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Management Alternatives<br />
nonnative plants, exp<strong>and</strong> habitat for native wildlife, <strong>and</strong> minimize the potential for erosion. A<br />
typical species list for such plantings would include: flat-top or California buckwheat<br />
(Eriogonum fasciculatum), California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), lemonade berry<br />
(Rhus integrifolia), broom baccharis (Baccharis sarothroides), coyote brush (Baccharis<br />
pilularis), California encelia (Encelia californica), white sage (Salvia apiana), <strong>and</strong> coastal<br />
goldenbush (Isocoma menziesii).<br />
Public Use Program<br />
No changes to the current public use program, as described under Alternative A, are proposed.<br />
Refuge Operations<br />
Under Alternative B, Refuge operations would include the construction of a maintenance<br />
storage building <strong>and</strong> new public restroom. These facilities would be constructed once funding is<br />
identified <strong>and</strong> the projects have been reviewed <strong>and</strong> approved by NWSSB. Both facilities would<br />
be constructed outside of the Refuge boundary adjacent to the existing Refuge Headquarters,<br />
located near the southwest corner of Kitts Highway <strong>and</strong> Bolsa Avenue (refer to Figure 3-3).<br />
This proposal does not require an expansion of the Refuge boundary. With Navy approval,<br />
these facilities can be constructed on Navy l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> would be used to serve management <strong>and</strong><br />
public use activities occurring on the adjacent Refuge. Additional details regarding these two<br />
facilities are provided below.<br />
Maintenance Storage Building. Currently, most of the Refuge tools <strong>and</strong> equipment are<br />
stored is three small sheds located adjacent to the existing Refuge Headquarters. Due to<br />
the lack of adequate storage space, some tools <strong>and</strong> equipment are also being stored in<br />
outdoor areas located adjacent to the sheds. Refuge vehicles must be stored outdoors,<br />
where they are subject to wire damage from rodents <strong>and</strong> rabbits. Maintenance work must<br />
also be conducted outdoors. To address these storage <strong>and</strong> maintenance problems, this<br />
alternative proposes the construction of a maintenance storage building on disturbed l<strong>and</strong><br />
to the south of the Refuge Headquarters. The approximately 3,000-square-foot building<br />
would include three vehicle bays to house a gator, small riding mower, <strong>and</strong> two passenger<br />
vehicles. The building would also provide storage space for tools <strong>and</strong> equipment, a work<br />
area <strong>and</strong> small office for a maintenance worker, <strong>and</strong> a restroom facility with a shower.<br />
Public Restroom Facility. The existing restroom facility in the Refuge Headquarters only<br />
has the capacity to accommodate one person at a time. This facility is woefully inadequate<br />
for meeting the needs of the public during monthly <strong>and</strong> special guided tours of the Refuge.<br />
To improve the visitor experience on the Refuge, this alternative includes a proposal to<br />
construction additional permanent male <strong>and</strong> female restrooms to accommodate the current<br />
need. This restroom facility, which would be constructed using green technologies to<br />
reduce water use <strong>and</strong> energy, would most likely be provided in a detached building placed<br />
on the north side of the Refuge Headquarters.<br />
Environmental Contaminants Coordination<br />
Environmental contaminants coordination would continue as described in Alternative A.<br />
Cultural Resource Management<br />
Although cultural resource management would continue to be implemented as described in<br />
Alternative A, this alternative also proposes to provide opportunities for archaeological <strong>and</strong><br />
historical research on the Refuge. Potential research topics might include: the effects of<br />
changes in the paleoenvironment on prehistoric people in the area of the Refuge; the<br />
prehistoric occupation patterns on the Refuge’s historic upl<strong>and</strong> areas; the identification of<br />
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/Environmental Assessment 3-33