09.04.2013 Views

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5 <br />

Measures shall be implemented to prevent visible dust emissions from leaving the project<br />

site boundary, including, but not limited to, watering prior to <strong>and</strong> during any earth<br />

movement; watering exposed soil three times per day, as applicable; installing wind<br />

fencing; covering excavated materials to prevent erosion; <strong>and</strong> stopping work during high<br />

wind conditions.<br />

The load of all haul vehicles shall be covered to reduce fugitive dust generated during the<br />

transport of materials <strong>and</strong> any stock piled material shall be covered to reduce the<br />

production of dust.<br />

Construction equipment <strong>and</strong> vehicles shall not track dirt <strong>and</strong> dust onto public roads <strong>and</strong> all<br />

equipment <strong>and</strong> tires shall be washed/swept prior to leaving the project site.<br />

All equipment used on the site shall meet SCAQMD st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

The additional activities proposed under Alternative B would not generate any additional vehicle<br />

trips following project completion, therefore, these proposal would not generate any long-term air<br />

emissions beyond those already described for Alternative A. Through the implementation of the<br />

measures described above, short-term emissions generated as a result of the proposed restoration<br />

would not contribute significantly to a cumulative increase in short-term emissions.<br />

Compliance with SCAQMD rules <strong>and</strong> regulations, as well as the implementation of the air quality<br />

measures described above, would ensure that air emission from the implementation of this<br />

alternative would not contribute significantly to a cumulative increase in emissions. Finally, the<br />

proposals in this alternative are not expected to exceed SCAQMD thresholds <strong>and</strong> Federal “de<br />

minimis” levels, however general conformity analysis may be implemented in the future when<br />

more detailed information about the restoration proposal is available.<br />

Pest Management<br />

Several pesticides are used on the Refuge including herbicides to control invasive plants <strong>and</strong><br />

insecticides, applied by OCVCD, to control mosquitoes. Pesticides in general can volatilize from<br />

soil <strong>and</strong> plant surfaces <strong>and</strong> move from the treated area into the atmosphere. The potential for a<br />

pesticide to volatilize is determined by the pesticide’s vapor pressure. Surflan AS is considered<br />

non volatile, while Aquamaster, Glyphosate Pro 4, <strong>and</strong> Habitat are volatile. Because all of these<br />

products are used at such low volumes on the Refuge, even the volatile products quickly become<br />

diluted in the atmosphere, minimizing the effect on local air quality. The potential for adverse air<br />

quality impacts as a result of pesticide use is further reduced through compliance with all federal,<br />

state, <strong>and</strong> local pesticide use laws <strong>and</strong> regulations, as well as Departmental, <strong>Service</strong>, <strong>and</strong> NWRS<br />

pesticide-related policies. This includes compliance with the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide <strong>and</strong><br />

Rodenticide Act of 1996 (FIFRA), which requires all pesticides to be applied at the rates <strong>and</strong> with<br />

the application equipment specified on the pesticide label. The IPM Plan (Appendix C) includes a<br />

number of BMPs that would be implemented in association with pesticide use of the Refuge to<br />

further minimize potential effects to air quality. Some of these BMPs include:<br />

Refuge staff will use low impact herbicide application techniques (e.g., spot treatment,<br />

cut stump, oil basal, Thinvert system applications) rather than broadcast foliar<br />

applications (e.g., boom sprayer, other larger tank w<strong>and</strong> applications), where practical;<br />

Refuge staff will use low volume rather than high volume foliar applications when the<br />

low impact methods described above are not feasible or practical, to maximize<br />

herbicide effectiveness <strong>and</strong> ensure correct <strong>and</strong> uniform application rates;<br />

5-22 Seal Beach National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!