09.04.2013 Views

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmental Consequences<br />

Contaminants – Adverse effects related to contaminants are considered significant when<br />

constituents of concern are present in the soil, groundwater, or surface water at levels that<br />

exceed st<strong>and</strong>ard screening levels for assessing ecological risk.<br />

5.2.1 Alternative A – No Action<br />

5.2.1.1 Effects to Topography/Visual Quality<br />

<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />

Conducting the wildlife <strong>and</strong> habitat management activities currently occurring on the Refuge,<br />

including monitoring of listed endangered <strong>and</strong> threatened avian species; management of NASA<br />

Isl<strong>and</strong> to support least tern nesting; trash <strong>and</strong> debris removal, culvert management, scientific<br />

research, <strong>and</strong> predator management would not result in adverse effects to topography.<br />

Annual pre-nesting site preparation for the California least tern involves removing weedy<br />

vegetation from the NASA Isl<strong>and</strong> nesting site <strong>and</strong> improving substrate quality when necessary by<br />

spreading additional clean, light s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> shell fragments over some or all of the site; <strong>and</strong><br />

addressing any erosion problems around the outer edges of the nesting site. The continuation of<br />

these types of actions would result in negligible changes to the topography within the nesting site;<br />

therefore, no adverse effects related to topography would occur.<br />

Current Refuge wildlife <strong>and</strong> habitat management activities that could affect visual quality include<br />

the removal of weeds, repair to subsurface culverts, removal of trash <strong>and</strong> debris, installation of<br />

clapper rail nesting platforms, <strong>and</strong> yearly maintenance at the NASA Isl<strong>and</strong> California least tern<br />

nesting site. While some of these activities, including vegetation removal associated with culvert<br />

maintenance <strong>and</strong> control of invasive species, may change the visual character of the affected areas;<br />

these impacts are temporary in nature <strong>and</strong> result in only minor changes to the Refuge’s visual<br />

quality. Following construction, affected areas are replaced with appropriate native vegetation<br />

<strong>and</strong> areas where invasive species are controlled are replanted with native upl<strong>and</strong> species. These<br />

actions serve to mitigate temporary changes in the visual character of the site. Therefore,<br />

continuation of these management activities would not result in significant adverse effects to visual<br />

quality. Some minor beneficial effects would be expected as a result of trash <strong>and</strong> debris removal<br />

<strong>and</strong> the replacement of weedy species with native plants.<br />

Public Use<br />

No changes to the existing topography within the Refuge occur as a result of conducting the<br />

existing limited public use program on the Refuge; therefore, no impacts to topography related to<br />

public use would occur under this alternative.<br />

The facilities provided on the Refuge to accommodate public use include a pedestrian pathway<br />

along the south side of Bolsa Avenue east of Kitts Highway, an observation deck at the end of the<br />

pathway, low interpretive signage along the pathway <strong>and</strong> at the deck, <strong>and</strong> a kiosk to the north of<br />

the Refuge office/visitor contact station. None of these facilities block views of the Refuge, nor do<br />

they create any significant adverse effect to the visual quality of the Refuge.<br />

5.2.1.2 Effects to Geology/Soils<br />

<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />

None of the wildlife <strong>and</strong> habitat management activities currently occurring on the Refuge would<br />

trigger or accelerate substantial slope instability, subsidence, ground failure, or erosion, nor would<br />

they make the Refuge <strong>and</strong> its facilities any more susceptible to geological hazards, such as<br />

Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan 5-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!