Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Management Alternatives<br />
Volunteers <strong>and</strong> Partners<br />
Support for the Friends of Seal Beach NWR would continue as described in Alternative A <strong>and</strong><br />
coordination with the Refuge’s other partners, including NWSSB, would continue to be an<br />
important Refuge strategy.<br />
3.4.4 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from the Detailed Analysis<br />
The alternatives development process is designed to allow consideration of the widest possible<br />
range of issues <strong>and</strong> potential management approaches. During this process, various objectives <strong>and</strong><br />
strategies for achieving Refuge goals were considered but not selected for detailed study. Those<br />
alternatives that were eliminated from detailed study are presented below.<br />
Exp<strong>and</strong> the Number of California Least Tern Nesting Sites within the Refuge<br />
The potential for providing additional locations on the Refuge to support nesting least terns<br />
was given considerable thought by the planning team, <strong>and</strong> was discussed with other interested<br />
parties during our Habitat <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong> Management Review. The general consensus was that<br />
the existing least tern site on the Refuge has adequate capacity to support additional pairs of<br />
terns <strong>and</strong> there is currently no need for an additional site on the Refuge. Adding another site<br />
would require splitting time spent by predator management <strong>and</strong> monitoring personnel<br />
between the existing site <strong>and</strong> the new site, which could result in reduced protection for nesting<br />
birds at both locations. Based on these factors, identifying additional least tern nesting sites<br />
on the Refuge was eliminated from detailed study.<br />
Exp<strong>and</strong> the Refuge Boundary to Include the Los Cerritos Wetl<strong>and</strong>s<br />
During the public comment period, the suggestion was made that the Los Cerritos Wetl<strong>and</strong>s,<br />
located approximately one mile to the northwest of the Refuge, be incorporated into the<br />
boundaries of the Seal Beach NWR. These wetl<strong>and</strong>s are currently overseen by the Los<br />
Cerritos Wetl<strong>and</strong>s Authority, a joint powers authority of the City of Long Beach, City of Seal<br />
Beach, State Coastal Conservancy, <strong>and</strong> the Rivers <strong>and</strong> Mountains Conservancy. The purpose<br />
of the Authority is to provide for a comprehensive program of acquisition, protection,<br />
conservation, restoration, maintenance <strong>and</strong> operation <strong>and</strong> environmental enhancement of the<br />
Los Cerritos Wetl<strong>and</strong>s area consistent with the goals of flood protection, habitat protection<br />
<strong>and</strong> restoration, <strong>and</strong> improved water supply, water quality, groundwater recharge <strong>and</strong> water<br />
conservation. The Authority has the ability to acquire <strong>and</strong> own real property <strong>and</strong> to conduct<br />
<strong>and</strong> implement restoration planning.<br />
Including the Los Cerritos Wetl<strong>and</strong>s within the management responsibilities of the Seal Beach<br />
NWR was determined to be outside the scope of the purposes for which the Seal Beach NWR<br />
was established. Additionally, these wetl<strong>and</strong>s, which are not contiguous with Anaheim Bay, are<br />
currently being managed by a Joint Powers Authority (JPA), consisting of local, state, <strong>and</strong> a<br />
nongovernmental agency. This JPA has been established for the specific purpose of<br />
overseeing the comprehensive conservation of these wetl<strong>and</strong>s.<br />
Include Oil Isl<strong>and</strong> into the Refuge Following Termination of Oil Production Activities<br />
Several proposals were initially considered for the reuse of Oil Isl<strong>and</strong> once oil production<br />
ceases at this site. However, after further review, the reuse of Oil Isl<strong>and</strong> is not currently a<br />
viable option based on the operator’s current agreement with the Navy. This agreement<br />
requires that Oil Isl<strong>and</strong> be removed <strong>and</strong> salt marsh habitat to be restored when oil production<br />
ceases at this location. Any proposal to do something other than restore salt marsh habitat at<br />
this site would require a full evaluation of alternatives, appropriate NEPA documentation, <strong>and</strong><br />
potential permits from various state <strong>and</strong>/or federal agencies.<br />
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/Environmental Assessment 3-39