Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 5 <br />
Equipment will be calibrated regularly to ensure that the proper rate of pesticide is<br />
applied to the target area or species;<br />
When spraying large areas, use drift retardants to reduce aerial drift of pesticides;<br />
Spray applications will be made at the lowest height for uniform coverage of target<br />
pests to minimize or eliminate potential drift; <strong>and</strong><br />
If windy conditions frequently occur during afternoons, spraying (especially boom<br />
treatments) will typically be conducted during early morning hours.<br />
Public Use<br />
The continuation of the limited public use program as currently conducted on the Refuge would not<br />
result in any significant adverse effects to air quality. Vehicular emissions from the travel of<br />
visitors to the Refuge for monthly tours are negligible in the context of the wider airshed of the<br />
SCAQMD.<br />
5.2.2.9 Effects Related to Greenhouse Gas Emissions<br />
<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />
In addition to the management activities described for Alternative A, Alternative B also proposes<br />
the restoration <strong>and</strong> enhancement of approximately 36 acres of tidally influenced habitat, replace<br />
the culverts in the Bolsa Cell, <strong>and</strong> remove concrete debris from the marsh. These additional<br />
activities will result in a temporary increase in GHG emissions over those anticipated under<br />
Alternative A, however, the proposed construction activities will occur over relatively short period<br />
of time. The overall GHG emissions generated by two or three construction vehicles operating<br />
over a one to two month period would be relatively low compared to the other activities occurring<br />
within the SCAQMD. Therefore, the GHG emissions anticipated to result from the<br />
implementation of this alternative are not expected to represent a significant direct or indirect<br />
impact on the environment.<br />
To further reduce the total GHG emissions generated from the operation <strong>and</strong> maintenance of the<br />
Refuge, as vehicles are replaced, new vehicles will be selected that have better fuel economy. In<br />
addition, where ever possible, tasks requiring off-Refuge travel will be combined to reduce the<br />
total number of miles driven by Refuge staff. Office equipment, including light fixtures, will be<br />
evaluated <strong>and</strong> replaced as necessary with “Energy Star” qualified products. The power<br />
management features on all computers <strong>and</strong> monitors will be activated, laptop power cords will be<br />
unplugged when not in use, <strong>and</strong> all equipment <strong>and</strong> lights will be turned off at the end of the day.<br />
Public Use<br />
The effects of the Refuge’s existing public use program on GHG emissions would be the same<br />
under Alternative B as were described in Section 5.2.1.9 for Alternative A.<br />
5.2.2.10 Effects Related to Contaminants<br />
<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />
Under Alternative B, several areas on the Refuge are proposed as sites for future restoration. Of<br />
these restoration sites, the area southeast of the 7 th Street Pond was formerly used by the Navy as<br />
an explosives burning ground. Groundwater sampling at this site in 2003 <strong>and</strong> 2004 indicated that<br />
no contaminants concerns were present at the site <strong>and</strong> the site was considered closed.<br />
Nevertheless, coordination with the Navy during the development of specific restoration plans for<br />
this site would be conducted to ensure that no constituents of concern to Refuge trust resources or<br />
water quality are present at the site. In addition, the monitoring wells that were installed at this<br />
site to facilitate monitoring of contaminants levels would have to be removed prior to restoration.<br />
5-24 Seal Beach National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge