09.04.2013 Views

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5 <br />

Equipment will be calibrated regularly to ensure that the proper rate of pesticide is<br />

applied to the target area or species;<br />

When spraying large areas, use drift retardants to reduce aerial drift of pesticides;<br />

Spray applications will be made at the lowest height for uniform coverage of target<br />

pests to minimize or eliminate potential drift; <strong>and</strong><br />

If windy conditions frequently occur during afternoons, spraying (especially boom<br />

treatments) will typically be conducted during early morning hours.<br />

Public Use<br />

The continuation of the limited public use program as currently conducted on the Refuge would not<br />

result in any significant adverse effects to air quality. Vehicular emissions from the travel of<br />

visitors to the Refuge for monthly tours are negligible in the context of the wider airshed of the<br />

SCAQMD.<br />

5.2.2.9 Effects Related to Greenhouse Gas Emissions<br />

<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />

In addition to the management activities described for Alternative A, Alternative B also proposes<br />

the restoration <strong>and</strong> enhancement of approximately 36 acres of tidally influenced habitat, replace<br />

the culverts in the Bolsa Cell, <strong>and</strong> remove concrete debris from the marsh. These additional<br />

activities will result in a temporary increase in GHG emissions over those anticipated under<br />

Alternative A, however, the proposed construction activities will occur over relatively short period<br />

of time. The overall GHG emissions generated by two or three construction vehicles operating<br />

over a one to two month period would be relatively low compared to the other activities occurring<br />

within the SCAQMD. Therefore, the GHG emissions anticipated to result from the<br />

implementation of this alternative are not expected to represent a significant direct or indirect<br />

impact on the environment.<br />

To further reduce the total GHG emissions generated from the operation <strong>and</strong> maintenance of the<br />

Refuge, as vehicles are replaced, new vehicles will be selected that have better fuel economy. In<br />

addition, where ever possible, tasks requiring off-Refuge travel will be combined to reduce the<br />

total number of miles driven by Refuge staff. Office equipment, including light fixtures, will be<br />

evaluated <strong>and</strong> replaced as necessary with “Energy Star” qualified products. The power<br />

management features on all computers <strong>and</strong> monitors will be activated, laptop power cords will be<br />

unplugged when not in use, <strong>and</strong> all equipment <strong>and</strong> lights will be turned off at the end of the day.<br />

Public Use<br />

The effects of the Refuge’s existing public use program on GHG emissions would be the same<br />

under Alternative B as were described in Section 5.2.1.9 for Alternative A.<br />

5.2.2.10 Effects Related to Contaminants<br />

<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />

Under Alternative B, several areas on the Refuge are proposed as sites for future restoration. Of<br />

these restoration sites, the area southeast of the 7 th Street Pond was formerly used by the Navy as<br />

an explosives burning ground. Groundwater sampling at this site in 2003 <strong>and</strong> 2004 indicated that<br />

no contaminants concerns were present at the site <strong>and</strong> the site was considered closed.<br />

Nevertheless, coordination with the Navy during the development of specific restoration plans for<br />

this site would be conducted to ensure that no constituents of concern to Refuge trust resources or<br />

water quality are present at the site. In addition, the monitoring wells that were installed at this<br />

site to facilitate monitoring of contaminants levels would have to be removed prior to restoration.<br />

5-24 Seal Beach National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!