09.04.2013 Views

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5 <br />

would ensure that no significant adverse impacts related to hydrology <strong>and</strong> flooding would result<br />

from the implementation of Alternative B.<br />

Public Use<br />

The continuation of the limited public use program proposed under Alternative B would not result<br />

in any significant adverse effects to local hydrology on the Refuge or beyond the Refuge boundary<br />

in Anaheim Bay.<br />

5.2.2.6 Effects to Water Quality<br />

<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />

Habitat restoration <strong>and</strong> enhancement proposals included under Alternative B that could have an<br />

effect on water quality include the grading activity associated with the restoration of tidal influence<br />

to approximately 36 acres within the Refuge, as well as activities associated with replacing existing<br />

culverts, including the culverts in the Bolsa Levee. These actions have the potential to increase<br />

erosion <strong>and</strong> sedimentation into adjacent wetl<strong>and</strong> areas, particularly during storm events. Excess<br />

sediment in runoff from a construction site both during <strong>and</strong> after construction can cause increased<br />

turbidity in natural water systems, reducing the amount of sunlight reaching aquatic plants, such<br />

as eelgrass, clogging fish gills, <strong>and</strong> blanketing aquatic habitat <strong>and</strong> potential spawning areas with<br />

silt. Sediment introduced into adjacent waterway can also transport other pollutants such as<br />

nutrients, metals, <strong>and</strong> oils <strong>and</strong> greases into adjacent wetl<strong>and</strong>s. These effects can be avoided<br />

through appropriate construction design <strong>and</strong> construction activity.<br />

To avoid such water quality impacts, the construction specifications for each individual restoration<br />

project would include the requirement to implement appropriate BMPs. These BMPs could<br />

include the use of silt fencing, straw wattles, <strong>and</strong> filter fabric to prevent the introduction of exposed<br />

soils into adjacent wetl<strong>and</strong> areas, the installation of cofferdams during construction, proper<br />

maintenance <strong>and</strong> fueling of construction vehicles to avoid spills <strong>and</strong> tracking of dirt onto public<br />

roadways, <strong>and</strong> appropriate erosion control techniques following construction to minimize the<br />

potential for erosion while the desired vegetation becomes established. With the implementation<br />

of appropriate BMPs, no adverse effects to water quality within the Refuge or Anaheim Bay would<br />

occur as a result of any ground disturbing activities proposed under Alternative B.<br />

The potential for impacts to water quality would be further reduced by the implementation of a<br />

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction, as required by the State of<br />

California as part of the California NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges<br />

Associated with Construction <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Disturbance Activities. Coverage under this General<br />

Permit, which involves electronically filing the Permit Registration Documents (i.e., Notice of<br />

Intent, SWPPP, <strong>and</strong> other compliance related documents required by this General Permit) with<br />

the State, would be obtained for all construction projects on the Refuge, including restoration<br />

projects, which disturb one or more acres of l<strong>and</strong> surface.<br />

Alternative B also proposes the implementation of a water quality monitoring program to regularly<br />

collect data on the basic physical parameters of the waters within the Refuge. Additionally, Refuge<br />

staff would participate in other federal, state, <strong>and</strong> local agency activities related to the<br />

improvement of quality of water throughout the watersheds that ultimately empty into Anaheim<br />

Bay. Through such a multi-agency partnership, the Refuge would seek to implement measures<br />

that would reduce the level of pollutants in the Bolsa Chica <strong>and</strong> East Garden Grove-Wintersburg<br />

channels that could adversely affect habitat quality <strong>and</strong> trust resources on the Refuge. To the<br />

extent that its aims could be achieved, this proposal’s effects on water quality would be beneficial.<br />

5-16 Seal Beach National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!