Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 5 <br />
would ensure that no significant adverse impacts related to hydrology <strong>and</strong> flooding would result<br />
from the implementation of Alternative B.<br />
Public Use<br />
The continuation of the limited public use program proposed under Alternative B would not result<br />
in any significant adverse effects to local hydrology on the Refuge or beyond the Refuge boundary<br />
in Anaheim Bay.<br />
5.2.2.6 Effects to Water Quality<br />
<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />
Habitat restoration <strong>and</strong> enhancement proposals included under Alternative B that could have an<br />
effect on water quality include the grading activity associated with the restoration of tidal influence<br />
to approximately 36 acres within the Refuge, as well as activities associated with replacing existing<br />
culverts, including the culverts in the Bolsa Levee. These actions have the potential to increase<br />
erosion <strong>and</strong> sedimentation into adjacent wetl<strong>and</strong> areas, particularly during storm events. Excess<br />
sediment in runoff from a construction site both during <strong>and</strong> after construction can cause increased<br />
turbidity in natural water systems, reducing the amount of sunlight reaching aquatic plants, such<br />
as eelgrass, clogging fish gills, <strong>and</strong> blanketing aquatic habitat <strong>and</strong> potential spawning areas with<br />
silt. Sediment introduced into adjacent waterway can also transport other pollutants such as<br />
nutrients, metals, <strong>and</strong> oils <strong>and</strong> greases into adjacent wetl<strong>and</strong>s. These effects can be avoided<br />
through appropriate construction design <strong>and</strong> construction activity.<br />
To avoid such water quality impacts, the construction specifications for each individual restoration<br />
project would include the requirement to implement appropriate BMPs. These BMPs could<br />
include the use of silt fencing, straw wattles, <strong>and</strong> filter fabric to prevent the introduction of exposed<br />
soils into adjacent wetl<strong>and</strong> areas, the installation of cofferdams during construction, proper<br />
maintenance <strong>and</strong> fueling of construction vehicles to avoid spills <strong>and</strong> tracking of dirt onto public<br />
roadways, <strong>and</strong> appropriate erosion control techniques following construction to minimize the<br />
potential for erosion while the desired vegetation becomes established. With the implementation<br />
of appropriate BMPs, no adverse effects to water quality within the Refuge or Anaheim Bay would<br />
occur as a result of any ground disturbing activities proposed under Alternative B.<br />
The potential for impacts to water quality would be further reduced by the implementation of a<br />
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction, as required by the State of<br />
California as part of the California NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges<br />
Associated with Construction <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Disturbance Activities. Coverage under this General<br />
Permit, which involves electronically filing the Permit Registration Documents (i.e., Notice of<br />
Intent, SWPPP, <strong>and</strong> other compliance related documents required by this General Permit) with<br />
the State, would be obtained for all construction projects on the Refuge, including restoration<br />
projects, which disturb one or more acres of l<strong>and</strong> surface.<br />
Alternative B also proposes the implementation of a water quality monitoring program to regularly<br />
collect data on the basic physical parameters of the waters within the Refuge. Additionally, Refuge<br />
staff would participate in other federal, state, <strong>and</strong> local agency activities related to the<br />
improvement of quality of water throughout the watersheds that ultimately empty into Anaheim<br />
Bay. Through such a multi-agency partnership, the Refuge would seek to implement measures<br />
that would reduce the level of pollutants in the Bolsa Chica <strong>and</strong> East Garden Grove-Wintersburg<br />
channels that could adversely affect habitat quality <strong>and</strong> trust resources on the Refuge. To the<br />
extent that its aims could be achieved, this proposal’s effects on water quality would be beneficial.<br />
5-16 Seal Beach National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge