Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Environmental Consequences<br />
Table 5-5<br />
Summary of Potential Effects of Implementing Alternatives A, B, or C<br />
for the Seal Beach National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan<br />
Resource Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C<br />
Biological Resources<br />
Waterfowl, Seabirds,<br />
Shorebirds <strong>and</strong> Other<br />
Waterbirds<br />
L<strong>and</strong>birds<br />
<strong>Fish</strong> <strong>and</strong> other Marine<br />
Organisms<br />
Invertebrates, Amphibians,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Reptiles<br />
Not likely to result in<br />
any changes to the<br />
current diversity <strong>and</strong><br />
abundance<br />
Not likely to result in<br />
any changes to the<br />
current diversity <strong>and</strong><br />
abundance of these<br />
birds on the Refuge<br />
Ongoing Refuge<br />
maintenance projects,<br />
such as culvert<br />
replacement, indirectly<br />
benefits fish by<br />
improving water<br />
circulation in the<br />
marsh<br />
Presence/ distribution<br />
of invertebrates,<br />
amphibians, <strong>and</strong><br />
reptiles would be<br />
unlikely to change<br />
Habitat restoration <strong>and</strong><br />
enhancement activities<br />
would provide minor<br />
benefits to these birds<br />
Would likely result in a<br />
minor, indirect adverse<br />
effect to l<strong>and</strong>birds due to<br />
conversion of existing<br />
disturbed upl<strong>and</strong> habitat<br />
to salt marsh <strong>and</strong><br />
wetl<strong>and</strong>/upl<strong>and</strong><br />
transitional habitat<br />
Proposed restoration <strong>and</strong><br />
enhancement projects<br />
would likely result in<br />
some indirect beneficial<br />
effects to fish<br />
populations;<br />
implementing BMPs <strong>and</strong><br />
other conditions during<br />
the application of<br />
pesticides would<br />
minimize the potential for<br />
adverse effects; the use<br />
of Natular in coastal<br />
wetl<strong>and</strong>s could adversely<br />
affect fish <strong>and</strong> marine<br />
organisms<br />
Minor, indirect adverse<br />
effects could result from<br />
restoration/enhancement<br />
projects due to loss of<br />
transitional habitat;<br />
BMPs during pesticide<br />
use will minimize adverse<br />
effects from pesticides<br />
Same as Alternative B<br />
Less likely to result in a<br />
minor, indirect adverse<br />
effect to l<strong>and</strong>birds as<br />
existing disturbed<br />
upl<strong>and</strong> habitat would<br />
be converted primarily<br />
to native upl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
wetl<strong>and</strong>/upl<strong>and</strong><br />
transitional habitat<br />
Same as Alternative B,<br />
except Natular is not<br />
proposed for use on the<br />
Refuge under this<br />
alternative<br />
Generally the same as<br />
Alternative B, but under<br />
Alternative C a tiger<br />
beetle management<br />
plan would be<br />
implemented to protect<br />
tiger beetle populations<br />
on the Refuge<br />
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan 5-89